From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F0CC04FF3 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB9F6109F for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 10:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232422AbhEXKkk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 06:40:40 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:2545 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232494AbhEXKkj (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 06:40:39 -0400 IronPort-SDR: SAYChJR33r6cA+FqDroGpQl7lxnSokQdAdp84qjvr4BBFOqQKT9UnzzOMyoJ0f3gulySGLZgd/ sdkw4DJKBFGg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9993"; a="189288198" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="189288198" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2021 03:39:11 -0700 IronPort-SDR: PcO+E66VmG374XLsAYExHzLYCmd2p5UYVjH06KWPb56B/3gIYYjWd5quAn+iKG94r7uArXIfKR F4sq9X6qG3DA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="441968912" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2021 03:39:07 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1ll7zE-00EIVj-Oj; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:39:04 +0300 Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:39:04 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Linus Walleij , Jonathan Cameron , Hans de Goede , linux-iio , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Denis Ciocca , Daniel Drake , Stephan Gerhold Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v3] iio: st_sensors: Create extended attr macro Message-ID: References: <20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <323cc45a-6db2-8732-d3b0-784b1250d7f7@redhat.com> <20210522191527.228f795a@jic23-huawei> <20210524105042.00002e59@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 01:37:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:50:42AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 24 May 2021 11:43:11 +0200 > > Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:14 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > > @Linus, for IIO stuff, please put a cover letter on series as it makes it > > > > easier for people to reply with things like this > > > > > > OK sorry about that, I'll try to keep it in mind. > > > > > > > and still let me use b4 > > > > without manual tweaking. > > > > > > b4 only need the patches to be sent in a thread which I > > > actually did, at least this works fine for me from here: > > > > > > tmp]$ b4 am -t 20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org > > > Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518230722.522446-1-linus.walleij%40linaro.org > > > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/linux-iio > > > Analyzing 7 messages in the thread > > > --- > > > Writing ./v3_20210519_linus_walleij_iio_st_sensors_create_extended_attr_macro.mbx > > > ✓ [PATCH 1/5 v3] iio: st_sensors: Create extended attr macro > > > + Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede (✓ DKIM/redhat.com) > > > ✓ [PATCH 2/5 v3] iio: accel: st_sensors: Support generic mounting matrix > > > ✓ [PATCH 3/5 v3] iio: accel: st_sensors: Stop copying channels > > > ✓ [PATCH 4/5 v3] iio: magnetometer: st_magn: Support mount matrix > > > ✓ [PATCH 5/5 v3] iio: gyro: st_gyro: Support mount matrix > > > > That only adds the Reviewed-by for patch 1 which was not Hans' > > intention. If the reply was to a cover letter it would apply to all of the patches. > > It's easy to fix with `git filter-branch --msg-filter ...`. But OTOH, tools may not recognize a human intention well from the natural language, it's also recommended to the reviewers to be explicit that bots can handle it (here: add a tag per each patch that is considered to be tagged). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko