Re: [PATCH] phy: maxlinear: add Maxlinear GPY115/21x/24x driver

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

> >> +     linkmode_mod_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_5000baseT_Full_BIT,
> >> +                      phydev->supported,
> >> +                      ret & MDIO_PMA_NG_EXTABLE_5GBT);
> >> +
> > Does genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities() do the wrong thing here? What
> > does it get wrong?
> 
> The problem comes from condition "phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present & 
> MDIO_DEVS_AN".
> 
> Our product supports both C22 and C45.
> 
> In the real system, we found C22 was used by customers (with indirect 
> access to C45 registers when necessary).
> 
> Then during probe, in API "get_phy_device", it skips reading C45 IDs.
> 
> So that genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities skip the supported flag 
> ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Autoneg_BIT.

This sounds like a generic problem, which will affect any PHY which
has both C22 and C45. I wounder if it makes sense to add a helper
function which a PHY driver can call to get the
phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present populated?

> >> +static int gpy_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >> +{
> >> +     int ret;
> >> +
> >> +     ret = genphy_update_link(phydev);
> >> +     if (ret)
> >> +             return ret;
> >> +
> >> +     phydev->speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> >> +     phydev->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
> >> +     phydev->pause = 0;
> >> +     phydev->asym_pause = 0;
> >> +
> >> +     if (phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && phydev->autoneg_complete) {
> >> +             ret = genphy_c45_read_lpa(phydev);
> >> +             if (ret < 0)
> >> +                     return ret;
> >> +
> >> +             /* Read the link partner's 1G advertisement */
> >> +             ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_STAT1000);
> >> +             if (ret < 0)
> >> +                     return ret;
> >> +             mii_stat1000_mod_linkmode_lpa_t(phydev->lp_advertising, ret);
> > can genphy_read_lpa() be used here?
> 
> 2.5G is not covered in genphy_read_lpa.
> 
> If I use genphy_c45_read_lpa first then genphy_read_lpa after, it seems 
> a bit redundant.

I'm just trying to avoid repeating code which is in helpers. I think
this is the first PHY driver which uses a mixture of C22 and C45 like
this. So it could be the helpers need small modifications to make them
work. We should make those modifications, since your PHY is not likely
to be the only mixed C22 and C45 device.

   Andrew