From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: eesposit@redhat.com,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] block-copy: small fix and refactor
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:21:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLd33jBVl5k3RAZK@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLdLrrTszu8MMxPv@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 837 bytes --]
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > This is my suggestion how to refactor block-copy to avoid extra atomic
> > operations in
> > "[PATCH v2 0/7] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures"
> >
> > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
> > block-copy: fix block_copy_task_entry() progress update
> > block-copy: refactor copy_range handling
> >
> > block/block-copy.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> I posted suggestions for the doc comment on Patch 2, otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Thanks, fixed up the comment accordingly and applied to the block
branch.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 14:16 [PATCH 0/2] block-copy: small fix and refactor Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-28 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] block-copy: fix block_copy_task_entry() progress update Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-28 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] block-copy: refactor copy_range handling Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-02 9:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-02 11:43 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-02 9:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] block-copy: small fix and refactor Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-06-02 12:21 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-06-03 7:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-07 15:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-06-07 15:16 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-07 16:18 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 19:08 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLd33jBVl5k3RAZK@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.