Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: fix tlb_flush_guest()

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, May 28, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/5/28 03:28, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD is overkill, nuking the shadow page tables will completely
> > > > offset the performance gains of the paravirtualized flush.
> > 
> > Argh, I take that back.  The PV KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB flag doesn't distinguish
> > between flushing a specific mm and flushing the entire TLB.  The HyperV usage
> > (via KVM_REQ) also throws everything into a single bucket.  A full RELOAD still
> > isn't necessary as KVM just needs to sync all roots, not blast them away.  For
> > previous roots, KVM doesn't have a mechanism to defer the sync, so the immediate
> > fix will need to unload those roots.
> > 
> > And looking at KVM's other flows, __kvm_mmu_new_pgd() and kvm_set_cr3() are also
> > broken with respect to previous roots.  E.g. if the guest does a MOV CR3 that
> > flushes the entire TLB, followed by a MOV CR3 with PCID_NOFLUSH=1, KVM will fail
> > to sync the MMU on the second flush even though the guest can technically rely
> > on the first MOV CR3 to have synchronized any previous changes relative to the
> > fisrt MOV CR3.
> 
> Could you elaborate the problem please?
> When can a MOV CR3 that needs to flush the entire TLB if PCID is enabled?

Scratch that, I was wrong.  The SDM explicitly states that other PCIDs don't
need to be flushed if CR4.PCIDE=1.