From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59436C07E94 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A561611CC for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229682AbhFDKwI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 06:52:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44220 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229667AbhFDKwI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 06:52:08 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3C11611CC; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:50:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1622803822; bh=wBxHzdapbMAHKhiwDxATu1SofAyQ2eadxLMvhIlVc3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=g/q3Nbxnv7+BEYvEEnt4Uf9sbhvN20Ytzd9wQ/IJNfWciL+5d3E1aapNWz1FLvcCd rV6f87XNBpvYnae1tRzNee57LxKmzt6p8HWoXAm8UILk8iQC/h2Q0rWyVU7eTpVZ0H F1FtSIQwt46/E10IHiykciSPwL9Y90GfyTi1SW+Y= Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:50:19 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Linyu Yuan Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Linyu Yuan Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: eem: fix wrong eem header operation Message-ID: References: <20210603150947.4627-1-linyyuan@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210603150947.4627-1-linyyuan@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:09:47PM +0800, Linyu Yuan wrote: > From: Linyu Yuan > > when skb_clone() or skb_copy_expand() fail, How can these calls fail? If they do, what is the overall system health? > it should pull skb with lengh indicated by header, > or not it will read network data and check it as header. > > Signed-off-by: Linyu Yuan > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_eem.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) What commit does this fix? Should it go to stable kernels? If so, how far back? And any reason you didn't use scripts/get_maintainer.pl for who to send your patch to? thanks, greg k-h