All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Simon Glass <sjg-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] tests: Fix signedness comparisons warnings
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:45:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YM2EjDcQhJAyop9l@yekko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618180036.2ef17c4c-KTS7eRBhINUXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13286 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 06:00:36PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:35:00 +1000
> David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 06:10:33PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > With -Wsign-compare, compilers warn about a mismatching signedness in
> > > comparisons in various files in the tests/ directory.
> > > 
> > > For about half of the cases we can simply change the signed variable to
> > > be of an unsigned type, because they will never need to store negative
> > > values (which is the best fix of the problem).
> > > 
> > > In the remaining cases we can cast the signed variable to an unsigned
> > > type, provided we know for sure it is not negative.
> > > We see two different scenarios here:
> > > - We either just explicitly checked for this variable to be positive
> > >   (if (rc < 0) FAIL();), or
> > > - We rely on a function returning only positive values in the "length"
> > >   pointer if the function returned successfully: which we just checked.
> > > 
> > > At two occassions we compare with a constant "-1" (even though the
> > > variable is unsigned), so we just change this to ~0U to create an
> > > unsigned comparison value.
> > > 
> > > Since this is about the tests, let's also add explicit tests for those
> > > values really not being negative.
> > > 
> > > This fixes "make tests" (but not "make check" yet), when compiled
> > > with -Wsign-compare.  
> > 
> > Thanks for doing this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/dumptrees.c           |  2 +-
> > >  tests/fs_tree1.c            |  2 +-
> > >  tests/get_name.c            |  4 +++-
> > >  tests/integer-expressions.c |  2 +-
> > >  tests/nopulate.c            |  3 ++-
> > >  tests/overlay.c             |  4 +++-
> > >  tests/phandle_format.c      |  2 +-
> > >  tests/property_iterate.c    |  2 +-
> > >  tests/references.c          |  2 +-
> > >  tests/set_name.c            |  6 ++++--
> > >  tests/subnode_iterate.c     |  2 +-
> > >  tests/tests.h               |  2 +-
> > >  tests/testutils.c           | 12 +++++++++---
> > >  13 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/dumptrees.c b/tests/dumptrees.c
> > > index f1e0ea9..08967b3 100644
> > > --- a/tests/dumptrees.c
> > > +++ b/tests/dumptrees.c
> > > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static struct {
> > >  
> > >  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >  {
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	unsigned int i;
> > >  
> > >  	if (argc != 2) {
> > >  	    fprintf(stderr, "Missing output directory argument\n");
> > > diff --git a/tests/fs_tree1.c b/tests/fs_tree1.c
> > > index dff3880..978f6a3 100644
> > > --- a/tests/fs_tree1.c
> > > +++ b/tests/fs_tree1.c
> > > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void mkfile(const char *name, void *data, size_t len)
> > >  	rc = write(fd, data, len);
> > >  	if (rc < 0)
> > >  		FAIL("write(\"%s\"): %s", name, strerror(errno));
> > > -	if (rc != len)
> > > +	if ((unsigned)rc != len)
> > >  		FAIL("write(\"%s\"): short write", name);
> > >  	
> > >  	rc = close(fd);
> > > diff --git a/tests/get_name.c b/tests/get_name.c
> > > index 5a35103..d20bf30 100644
> > > --- a/tests/get_name.c
> > > +++ b/tests/get_name.c
> > > @@ -34,12 +34,14 @@ static void check_name(void *fdt, const char *path)
> > >  		       offset, getname, len);
> > >  	if (!getname)
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%d): %s", offset, fdt_strerror(len));
> > > +	if (len < 0)
> > > +		FAIL("negative name length (%d) for returned node name\n", len);
> > >  
> > >  	if (strcmp(getname, checkname) != 0)
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned \"%s\" instead of \"%s\"",
> > >  		     path, getname, checkname);
> > >  
> > > -	if (len != strlen(getname))
> > > +	if ((unsigned)len != strlen(getname))
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned length %d instead of %zd",
> > >  		     path, len, strlen(getname));
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/tests/integer-expressions.c b/tests/integer-expressions.c
> > > index 6f33d81..2f164d9 100644
> > > --- a/tests/integer-expressions.c
> > > +++ b/tests/integer-expressions.c
> > > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >  	void *fdt;
> > >  	const fdt32_t *res;
> > >  	int reslen;
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	unsigned int i;
> > >  
> > >  	test_init(argc, argv);
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/tests/nopulate.c b/tests/nopulate.c
> > > index 2ae1753..e06a0b3 100644
> > > --- a/tests/nopulate.c
> > > +++ b/tests/nopulate.c
> > > @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ static int nopulate_struct(char *buf, const char *fdt)
> > >  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >  {
> > >  	char *fdt, *fdt2, *buf;
> > > -	int newsize, struct_start, struct_end_old, struct_end_new, delta;
> > > +	int newsize, struct_end_old, struct_end_new, delta;
> > > +	unsigned int struct_start;  
> > 
> > Making just one of these variables unsigned looks pretty weird, but I
> > guess it works.  The alternative would be to much more strictly check
> > the various offsets here - which would also mean that adding the nops
> > does take the device tree beyond the allowed size.
> 
> TBH this was just the bare minimum mechanical fix, I haven't much looked
> into what this test really does.

Fair enough.  Fwiw this test inserts extra "nop" tags into the flat
tree, between every existing tag - this is done in order to then test
that other hings process the nops correctly.

> And there seem to be more issues, for instance we seem to assume
> that newsize is non-negative, but nopulate_struct() returns a signed
> type. And looking deeper, fdt_next_tag() can return a negative error
> value into nextoffset, at which point everything falls apart.
> 
> So I guess I will leave this for another rainy afternoon, to not block
> this particular patch.

Ok.

> > >  	const char *inname;
> > >  	char outname[PATH_MAX];
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/tests/overlay.c b/tests/overlay.c
> > > index 91afa72..b21b28e 100644
> > > --- a/tests/overlay.c
> > > +++ b/tests/overlay.c
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ static int fdt_getprop_u32_by_poffset(void *fdt, const char *path,
> > >  		return node_off;
> > >  
> > >  	val = fdt_getprop(fdt, node_off, name, &len);
> > > -	if (!val || (len < (sizeof(uint32_t) * (poffset + 1))))
> > > +	if (val && len < 0)
> > > +		return -FDT_ERR_BADVALUE;  
> > 
> > This indicates an internal error in libfdt that's more or less
> > independent of what this test is really looking for, better to just
> > FAIL() here rather than bubble this error up through the caller to
> > report.
> 
> Done.
> 
> > 
> > > +	if (!val || ((unsigned)len < (sizeof(uint32_t) * (poffset + 1))))
> > >  		return -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND;  
> > 
> > NOTFOUND seems kind of dangeous here, because this test catches both
> > true NOTFOUND cases (val==NULL && len == NOTFOUND), and broken cases
> > (val=NULL && len!=NOTFOUND), best to check the broken case explicitly
> > and FAIL().
> 
> Right, I fixed that, so that any case of len < 0 is handled before we
> come to the comparison.
> 
> > >  
> > >  	*out = fdt32_to_cpu(*(val + poffset));
> > > diff --git a/tests/phandle_format.c b/tests/phandle_format.c
> > > index d00618f..0febb32 100644
> > > --- a/tests/phandle_format.c
> > > +++ b/tests/phandle_format.c
> > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_path_offset(/node4): %s", fdt_strerror(n4));
> > >  
> > >  	h4 = fdt_get_phandle(fdt, n4);
> > > -	if ((h4 == 0) || (h4 == -1))
> > > +	if ((h4 == 0) || (h4 == ~0U))
> > >  		FAIL("/node4 has bad phandle 0x%x\n", h4);
> > >  
> > >  	if (phandle_format & PHANDLE_LEGACY)
> > > diff --git a/tests/property_iterate.c b/tests/property_iterate.c
> > > index 9a67f49..0b6af9b 100644
> > > --- a/tests/property_iterate.c
> > > +++ b/tests/property_iterate.c
> > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static void test_node(void *fdt, int parent_offset)
> > >  	uint32_t properties;
> > >  	const fdt32_t *prop;
> > >  	int offset, property;
> > > -	int count;
> > > +	unsigned int count;
> > >  	int len;
> > >  
> > >  	/*
> > > diff --git a/tests/references.c b/tests/references.c
> > > index d18e722..cb1daaa 100644
> > > --- a/tests/references.c
> > > +++ b/tests/references.c
> > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >  	if ((h4 == 0x2000) || (h4 == 0x1) || (h4 == 0))
> > >  		FAIL("/node4 has bad phandle, 0x%x", h4);
> > >  
> > > -	if ((h5 == 0) || (h5 == -1))
> > > +	if ((h5 == 0) || (h5 == ~0U))
> > >  		FAIL("/node5 has bad phandle, 0x%x", h5);
> > >  	if ((h5 == h4) || (h5 == h2) || (h5 == h1))
> > >  		FAIL("/node5 has duplicate phandle, 0x%x", h5);
> > > diff --git a/tests/set_name.c b/tests/set_name.c
> > > index a62cb58..5eeb7b9 100644
> > > --- a/tests/set_name.c
> > > +++ b/tests/set_name.c
> > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void check_set_name(void *fdt, const char *path, const char *newname)
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned \"%s\" instead of \"%s\"",
> > >  		     path, getname, oldname);
> > >  
> > 
> > > -	if (len != strlen(getname))
> > > +	if ((unsigned)len != strlen(getname))  
> > 
> > AFAICT you haven't actually checked for len < 0 before this, so this
> > isn't quite right
> 
> True, fixed.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned length %d instead of %zd",
> > >  		     path, len, strlen(getname));
> > >  
> > > @@ -51,12 +51,14 @@ static void check_set_name(void *fdt, const char *path, const char *newname)
> > >  	getname = fdt_get_name(fdt, offset, &len);
> > >  	if (!getname)
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%d): %s", offset, fdt_strerror(len));
> > > +	if (len < 0)
> > > +		FAIL("negative name length (%d) for returned node name\n", len);
> > >  
> > >  	if (strcmp(getname, newname) != 0)
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned \"%s\" instead of \"%s\"",
> > >  		     path, getname, newname);
> > >  
> > > -	if (len != strlen(getname))
> > > +	if ((unsigned)len != strlen(getname))
> > >  		FAIL("fdt_get_name(%s) returned length %d instead of %zd",
> > >  		     path, len, strlen(getname));
> > >  }
> > > diff --git a/tests/subnode_iterate.c b/tests/subnode_iterate.c
> > > index 2dc9b2d..2553a51 100644
> > > --- a/tests/subnode_iterate.c
> > > +++ b/tests/subnode_iterate.c
> > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static void test_node(void *fdt, int parent_offset)
> > >  	uint32_t subnodes;
> > >  	const fdt32_t *prop;
> > >  	int offset;
> > > -	int count;
> > > +	unsigned int count;
> > >  	int len;
> > >  
> > >  	/* This property indicates the number of subnodes to expect */
> > > diff --git a/tests/tests.h b/tests/tests.h
> > > index 1017366..bf8f23c 100644
> > > --- a/tests/tests.h
> > > +++ b/tests/tests.h
> > > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void cleanup(void);
> > >  void check_mem_rsv(void *fdt, int n, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size);
> > >  
> > >  void check_property(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *name,
> > > -		    int len, const void *val);
> > > +		    unsigned int len, const void *val);
> > >  #define check_property_cell(fdt, nodeoffset, name, val) \
> > >  	({ \
> > >  		fdt32_t x = cpu_to_fdt32(val);			      \
> > > diff --git a/tests/testutils.c b/tests/testutils.c
> > > index 5e494c5..10129c0 100644
> > > --- a/tests/testutils.c
> > > +++ b/tests/testutils.c
> > > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ void check_mem_rsv(void *fdt, int n, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  void check_property(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *name,
> > > -		    int len, const void *val)
> > > +		    unsigned int len, const void *val)
> > >  {
> > >  	const struct fdt_property *prop;
> > >  	int retlen, namelen;
> > > @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ void check_property(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *name,
> > >  	if (! prop)
> > >  		FAIL("Error retrieving \"%s\" pointer: %s", name,
> > >  		     fdt_strerror(retlen));
> > > +	if (retlen < 0)
> > > +		FAIL("negative name length (%d) for returned property\n",
> > > +		     retlen);
> > >  
> > >  	tag = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->tag);
> > >  	nameoff = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->nameoff);
> > > @@ -112,13 +115,16 @@ void check_property(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *name,
> > >  	propname = fdt_get_string(fdt, nameoff, &namelen);
> > >  	if (!propname)
> > >  		FAIL("Couldn't get property name: %s", fdt_strerror(namelen));
> > > -	if (namelen != strlen(propname))
> > > +	if (namelen < 0)
> > > +		FAIL("negative name length (%d) for returned string\n",
> > > +		     namelen);
> > > +	if ((unsigned)namelen != strlen(propname))
> > >  		FAIL("Incorrect prop name length: %d instead of %zd",
> > >  		     namelen, strlen(propname));
> > >  	if (!streq(propname, name))
> > >  		FAIL("Property name mismatch \"%s\" instead of \"%s\"",
> > >  		     propname, name);  
> > 
> > Don't you need to check for retlen < 0 as well?
> 
> But this is done above, in the previous hunk?

So it is, sorry.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-19  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-11 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/8] dtc: Fix signed/unsigned comparison warnings Andre Przywara
     [not found] ` <20210611171040.25524-1-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 1/8] tests: Fix signedness comparisons warnings Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-2-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:35       ` David Gibson
2021-06-18 17:00         ` Andre Przywara
     [not found]           ` <20210618180036.2ef17c4c-KTS7eRBhINUXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-19  5:45             ` David Gibson [this message]
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] fdtdump: " Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-3-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:36       ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 3/8] fdtget: " Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-4-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:44       ` David Gibson
2021-06-15 21:51         ` Andre Przywara
     [not found]           ` <20210615225133.4a597e7d-KTS7eRBhINUXU02nzanrWNbf9cGiqdzd@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-19  5:40             ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] dtc: Wrap phandle validity check Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-5-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:46       ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 5/8] dtc: Fix signedness comparisons warnings: reservednum Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-6-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:48       ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 6/8] dtc: Fix signedness comparisons warnings: pointer diff Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-7-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:49       ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 7/8] checks: Fix signedness comparisons warnings Andre Przywara
     [not found]     ` <20210611171040.25524-8-andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2021-06-15  2:55       ` David Gibson
2021-06-11 17:10   ` [PATCH v2 8/8] Makefile: add -Wsign-compare to warning options Andre Przywara
2021-06-15  2:56   ` [PATCH v2 0/8] dtc: Fix signed/unsigned comparison warnings David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YM2EjDcQhJAyop9l@yekko \
    --to=david-xt8fgy+axnrb3ne2bgzf6laj5h9x9tb+@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sjg-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.