From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hui.wang@canonical.com,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
rander.wang@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] soundwire: intel: move to auxiliary bus
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 21:02:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMEQRlviWBJA0Rwd@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07dbe0a2-0abb-810b-ef39-b83511d3f3e0@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:44:08AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The model is exactly the same as what we have today with the platform
> devices. We did not add ANY new fields or information, what is passed in
> that structure is exactly the same as what we do upstream today with the
> platform devices.
>
> To make my point, here is the structure in intel.h as of v5.13-rc1
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> void __iomem *mmio_base; /* not strictly needed, useful for debug */
> void __iomem *registers;
> void __iomem *shim;
> void __iomem *alh;
> int irq;
> const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */
> u32 *shim_mask;
> u32 clock_stop_quirks;
> u32 link_mask;
> struct sdw_cdns *cdns;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> and here's what we suggested in this patch:
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> void __iomem *mmio_base; /* not strictly needed, useful for debug */
> void __iomem *registers;
> void __iomem *shim;
> void __iomem *alh;
> int irq;
> const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */
> u32 *shim_mask;
> u32 clock_stop_quirks;
> u32 link_mask;
> struct sdw_cdns *cdns;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> You will notice that we removed the platform_device *pdev, but embedded this
> structure into a larger one to make use of container_of()
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_dev {
> struct auxiliary_device auxdev;
> struct sdw_intel_link_res link_res;
> };
>
> That's it. We did not change anything else, all the other fields are
> identical. We are only changing the TYPE of device and the interfaces for
> probe/remove but using the same information and the same device hierarchy.
And this is the correct thing to do, you have done it properly here,
nice work.
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
hui.wang@canonical.com, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
rander.wang@linux.intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] soundwire: intel: move to auxiliary bus
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 21:02:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMEQRlviWBJA0Rwd@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07dbe0a2-0abb-810b-ef39-b83511d3f3e0@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:44:08AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The model is exactly the same as what we have today with the platform
> devices. We did not add ANY new fields or information, what is passed in
> that structure is exactly the same as what we do upstream today with the
> platform devices.
>
> To make my point, here is the structure in intel.h as of v5.13-rc1
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> void __iomem *mmio_base; /* not strictly needed, useful for debug */
> void __iomem *registers;
> void __iomem *shim;
> void __iomem *alh;
> int irq;
> const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */
> u32 *shim_mask;
> u32 clock_stop_quirks;
> u32 link_mask;
> struct sdw_cdns *cdns;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> and here's what we suggested in this patch:
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_res {
> void __iomem *mmio_base; /* not strictly needed, useful for debug */
> void __iomem *registers;
> void __iomem *shim;
> void __iomem *alh;
> int irq;
> const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
> struct device *dev;
> struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */
> u32 *shim_mask;
> u32 clock_stop_quirks;
> u32 link_mask;
> struct sdw_cdns *cdns;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> You will notice that we removed the platform_device *pdev, but embedded this
> structure into a larger one to make use of container_of()
>
> struct sdw_intel_link_dev {
> struct auxiliary_device auxdev;
> struct sdw_intel_link_res link_res;
> };
>
> That's it. We did not change anything else, all the other fields are
> identical. We are only changing the TYPE of device and the interfaces for
> probe/remove but using the same information and the same device hierarchy.
And this is the correct thing to do, you have done it properly here,
nice work.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-09 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 5:21 [PATCH v4] soundwire: intel: move to auxiliary bus Bard Liao
2021-05-11 5:21 ` Bard Liao
2021-05-25 18:30 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-05-25 18:30 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-05-31 10:19 ` Vinod Koul
2021-05-31 10:19 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-01 13:56 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-06-09 4:46 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-09 14:44 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-06-09 15:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 15:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 16:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-06-11 11:26 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-11 11:26 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-11 13:29 ` Greg KH
2021-06-11 13:29 ` Greg KH
2021-06-09 19:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-06-09 19:02 ` Greg KH
2021-06-11 11:59 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-11 14:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-06-14 4:43 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-14 4:42 ` Vinod Koul
2021-06-14 4:42 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMEQRlviWBJA0Rwd@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.