From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Rename "dynamic" XSTATEs to "independent"
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:01:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMMYUGW9f7CUJ+oz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1eecb0e4f3e07828ebe5d737ec77dc3b708fad2d.1623388344.git.luto@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:13:36PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The salient feature of "dynamic" XSTATEs is that they are not part of the
> main task XSTATE buffer. The fact that they are dynamically allocated is
> irrelevant and will become quite confusing when user math XSTATEs start
> being dynamically allocated. Rename them to "independent" because they
> are independent of the main XSTATE code.
>
> This is just a search-and-replace with some whitespace updates to keep
> things aligned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 6 +--
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 14 +++----
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 62 +++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> index 76dbab6ac9fb..0189807fc3c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_arch_lbr_xrstors(void *ctx)
> {
> struct x86_perf_task_context_arch_lbr_xsave *task_ctx = ctx;
>
> - copy_kernel_to_dynamic_supervisor(&task_ctx->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
> + copy_kernel_to_independent_supervisor(&task_ctx->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
> }
>
> static __always_inline bool lbr_is_reset_in_cstate(void *ctx)
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_arch_lbr_xsaves(void *ctx)
> {
> struct x86_perf_task_context_arch_lbr_xsave *task_ctx = ctx;
>
> - copy_dynamic_supervisor_to_kernel(&task_ctx->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
> + copy_independent_supervisor_to_kernel(&task_ctx->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
> }
>
> static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
> @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_arch_lbr_read_xsave(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
> intel_pmu_store_lbr(cpuc, NULL);
> return;
> }
> - copy_dynamic_supervisor_to_kernel(&xsave->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
> + copy_independent_supervisor_to_kernel(&xsave->xsave, XFEATURE_MASK_LBR);
>
> intel_pmu_store_lbr(cpuc, xsave->lbr.entries);
> }
Yesterday tglx proposed the *save*_to_{user,kernel}() and
*rstor*_from_{user,kernel}() namespace for pretty much every other such
function.
And while I agree that independent_supervisor beats dynamic_supervisor
for a name, they're both stupid long :-(
I don't suppose we can simply use xsaves_to_kernel()
xstrors_from_kernel() and add some magic to their respective mask
handling to ensure that a mask belongs to only 1 (of 3) types.
int types = 0;
if (mask & xfeatures_mask_user())
type++;
if (mask & xfeatures_mask_supervisor())
types++;
if (mask & xfeatures_mask_independent())
types++;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(type != 1))
return;
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-11 5:13 [PATCH 0/2] x86/fpu: Clean up "dynamic" APIs Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-11 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Rename "dynamic" XSTATEs to "independent" Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-11 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-06-11 13:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-23 22:09 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-11 5:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/fpu: Improve FPU APIs for independent features Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMMYUGW9f7CUJ+oz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.