From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B4BC48BE6 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BFE56109D for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:22:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9BFE56109D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.143265.264090 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltWQK-00020g-Pb; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:44 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 143265.264090; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltWQK-00020Z-Mh; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:44 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 143265; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:43 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltWQJ-00020T-8J for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:43 +0000 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f9b3c938-3dfe-4a50-a922-7f1ededa09f7; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:21:41 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: f9b3c938-3dfe-4a50-a922-7f1ededa09f7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1623853301; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=S6oR3vmD89E5yDMHzIIjiuiUjUWHabH851embpyzv9k=; b=Q6KLxEa0kMs/P7PsEj5Jqy3S/X2St79Q8z4GfEskBRqFycKUI/NBej9a jJ3ByH8q5TJ2h8QiDV0/4TXoG43+v3WUMhfY+K+q7fuaaZMK/0UZwsto7 NxPQKV/sWb6x4SfRZ0YqVUS3m7G62OGRN9T2IEXV/2CrGj7gwMvBZerq8 Y=; Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: J8SVoTDNiCQt5iq6TEd7SB3RNRjD6UJhe9Xwk9NOxhz5ymEPMBVkFnrGglOzzSNT6SDc2dU9BZ y+ODT/w+msq0VVmKVUX0X6lok/5itG4br+ZGd3gR0pNe4fisOPGd+vr5FS9vmaL40MTMlw+Crk 10hpkdTLG+JK2HvdVL0aVzobbP2/r0RWt+BDLgAQxKw4wWlZAL0y5o75tzvXM9FkVv3Q+bWfBI Fo70DdYsRoym2q2inKSwCg32ZSuUUFAoHp14HfYnMigx/6QEh6MojC2KQA+LUavmSPvsd4Kgm1 5xw= X-SBRS: 5.1 X-MesageID: 46270533 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:f9QSPKtXIsM4kTw002QKuXdC7skDdNV00zEX/kB9WHVpmszxra GTddAgpHjJYVcqKRUdcL+7VJVoLUmyyXcx2/h2AV7AZniChILLFvAA0WKK+VSJcEeSygce79 YDT0EXMqyIMbEQt6bHCWeDfeod/A== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,278,1616472000"; d="scan'208";a="46270533" Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:21:37 +0100 From: Anthony PERARD To: Jan Beulich CC: Ian Jackson , , osstest service owner Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 162845: regressions - FAIL Message-ID: References: <8e39ca8f-3202-7d3a-d65d-7087634bd49e@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8e39ca8f-3202-7d3a-d65d-7087634bd49e@suse.com> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.06.2021 08:54, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 162845 xen-unstable real [real] > > flight 162853 xen-unstable real-retest [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162845/ > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162853/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 15 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 162533 > > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 15 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 162533 > > There looks to still be an issue with the ovmf version used. I'm > puzzled to find this flight reporting > > built_revision_ovmf e1999b264f1f9d7230edf2448f757c73da567832 > > which isn't what the tree recently was rewound to, but about two > dozen commits older. I hope one of you has a clue at what is going > on here. So this commit is "master" from https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/ovmf.git rather than "xen-tested-master" from https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/osstest/ovmf.git master is what xen.git would have cloned. And "xen-tested-master" is the commit that I was expecting osstest to pick up, but maybe that as been setup only for stable trees? Anyway, after aad7b5c11d51 ("tools/firmware/ovmf: Use OvmfXen platform file is exist"), it isn't the same OVMF that is been used. We used to use OvmfX64, but now we are going to use OvmfXen. (Xen support in OvmfX64 has been removed so can't be used anymore.) So there is maybe an issue with OvmfXen which doesn't need to block xen-unstable flights. As for the failure, I can think of one thing in that is different, OvmfXen maps the XENMAPSPACE_shared_info page as high as possible in the guest physical memory, in order to avoid creating hole the RAM, but a call to XENMEM_remove_from_physmap is done as well. Could that actually cause issues with saverestore? So maybe we can force-push in the mean time if tests with OVMF is the only failure. -- Anthony PERARD