From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 09:33:42 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: References: <492294b2-b305-86f4-2c91-a2faa766d2ee@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <492294b2-b305-86f4-2c91-a2faa766d2ee@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] multiple virtiofsd's + overlapping shared subtree -> enforced compatible xattr maps? List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Harry G. Coin" Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com * Harry G. Coin (hgcoin@gmail.com) wrote: > If two or more instances of virtiofsd have a common full or partially > shared directory tree path -- how will those instances 'enforce' a > 'compatible' xattr map lest the host+guest(s) have quite the selinux > attribute salad? Virtiofsd instances are independent; it's upto whatever runs the daemons to pick the options in a sane way. >=A0 How much does virtiofsd need to feel like nfsd...? What does nfsd do for this? Dave >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Virtio-fs mailing list > Virtio-fs@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs --=20 Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK