All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ulrich Hecht <uli@fpond.eu>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: disable tuning when checking card presence
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 20:58:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNd4vIJjpaSmFD9t@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5062770-ba5c-32d5-15f0-505a09bb4a2e@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]

Hi Adrian, Ulf, everyone,

> With the code above, if the host controller knows the card has been
> removed, it can return -ENOMEDIUM from ->execute_tuning() to suppress
> the message.

On second thought, I like the idea with -ENOMEDIUM. Because tuning can
still fail for reasons other than a removed card and we want to see an
error message then.

So, I checked when/how to return -ENOMEDIUM for the SDHI driver but this
lead me to more questions. The few driver which return this error code
all follow a similar pattern:

xxx_request()
{
	if (host->get_cd == 1)
		submit_mrq
	else
		cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM
		mmc_request_done()
}

So, my first question would be if we can't apply this pattern in the
core before calling the .request callback? A lot of drivers are not
implementing this pattern although it seems useful. Is it required?
Recommended? Nice to have? However, I could imagine an answer for moving
it into the core is "no, that should be checked atomically"? E.g. sdhci
does it, but atmel-mci and s3cmci do not. If I just look at moving the
card detection call into the core, I don't really see the reason for
atomic. Am I missing something?

All the best,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-26 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18  8:23 [PATCH] mmc: disable tuning when checking card presence Wolfram Sang
2021-06-18 10:34 ` Ulrich Hecht
2021-06-18 10:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-21  7:15   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-21  7:32     ` Ulrich Hecht
2021-06-21  7:54       ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-21  8:11         ` Wolfram Sang
2021-06-21  8:26           ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-26 18:58             ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2021-06-29 14:16               ` Ulf Hansson
2021-06-29 16:01                 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-30  4:08             ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YNd4vIJjpaSmFD9t@ninjato \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=uli@fpond.eu \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.