From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:06:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNyIYNpcy2WsnUnu@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxi6pMEehkXWAk=vzx3mZAfcxwVPvFs9W7LM2CfgBkZWxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:56:34PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:44 PM Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while using the
> > copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file. Before commit
> > 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") the
> > kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to copy a file across
> > different filesystems. After this commit, the syscall doesn't fail anymore
> > and instead returns zero (zero bytes copied), as this file's content is
> > generated on-the-fly and thus reports a size of zero.
> >
> > This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that existed
> > prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
> > devices"). Filesystems are still allowed to fall-back to the VFS
> > generic_copy_file_range() implementation, but that has now to be done
> > explicitly.
> >
> > nfsd is also modified to fall-back into generic_copy_file_range() in case
> > vfs_copy_file_range() fails with -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV.
> >
> > Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx+BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/
> > Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> > ---
> > Changes since v9
> > - the early return from the syscall when len is zero now checks if the
> > filesystem is implemented, returning -EOPNOTSUPP if it is not and 0
> > otherwise. Issue reported by test robot.
>
> What issue was reported?
Here's the link to my previous email:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/877dk1zibo.fsf@suse.de/
... which reminds me that I need to also send a patch to fix the fstest.
(Although the test as-is actually allowed to find this bug...)
Cheers,
--
Luís
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 13:44 [PATCH v10] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-06-30 14:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-30 15:06 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2021-06-30 15:38 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNyIYNpcy2WsnUnu@suse.de \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.