From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, rafael@kernel.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
sbrivio@redhat.com, jianpeng.ma@intel.com,
valentin.schneider@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
bristot@redhat.com, guodong.xu@linaro.org,
tangchengchang@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com,
yangyicong@huawei.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] lib: test_bitmap: add bitmap_print_to_buf test cases
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:47:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPCe+f3GPDUuvwnW@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPAlg5c8uDSZ2WvZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 03:09:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 11:58:56PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > The added test items cover both cases where bitmap buf of the printed
> > result is greater than and less than 4KB.
> > And it also covers the case where offset for bitmap_print_to_buf is
> > non-zero which will happen when printed buf is larger than one page
> > in sysfs bin_attribute.
>
> More test cases is always a good thing, thanks!
Generally yes. But in this case... I believe, Barry didn't write that
huge line below by himself. Most probably he copy-pasted the output of
his bitmap_print_buf() into the test. If so, this code tests nothing,
and just enforces current behavior of snprintf.
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> > ---
> > -v7:
> > minor cleanup according to Andy's comments
[...]
> > +static const char large_list[] __initconst = /* more than 4KB */
> > + "0,4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32-33,36-37,40-41,44-45,48-49,52-53,56-57,60-61,64,68,72,76,80,84,88,92,96-97,100-101,104-1"
> > + "05,108-109,112-113,116-117,120-121,124-125,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160-161,164-165,168-169,172-173,176-1"
> > + "77,180-181,184-185,188-189,192,196,200,204,208,212,216,220,224-225,228-229,232-233,236-237,240-241,244-245,248-2"
I don't like this behavior of the code: each individual line is not a
valid bitmap_list. I would prefer to split original bitmap and print
list representation of parts in a compatible format; considering a
receiving part of this splitting machinery.
Thanks,
Yury
> > + "49,252-253,256,260,264,268,272,276,280,284,288-289,292-293,296-297,300-301,304-305,308-309,312-313,316-317,320,3"
> > + "24,328,332,336,340,344,348,352-353,356-357,360-361,364-365,368-369,372-373,376-377,380-381,384,388,392,396,400,4"
> > + "04,408,412,416-417,420-421,424-425,428-429,432-433,436-437,440-441,444-445,448,452,456,460,464,468,472,476,480-4"
> > + "81,484-485,488-489,492-493,496-497,500-501,504-505,508-509,512,516,520,524,528,532,536,540,544-545,548-549,552-5"
> > + "53,556-557,560-561,564-565,568-569,572-573,576,580,584,588,592,596,600,604,608-609,612-613,616-617,620-621,624-6"
> > + "25,628-629,632-633,636-637,640,644,648,652,656,660,664,668,672-673,676-677,680-681,684-685,688-689,692-693,696-6"
> > + "97,700-701,704,708,712,716,720,724,728,732,736-737,740-741,744-745,748-749,752-753,756-757,760-761,764-765,768,7"
> > + "72,776,780,784,788,792,796,800-801,804-805,808-809,812-813,816-817,820-821,824-825,828-829,832,836,840,844,848,8"
> > + "52,856,860,864-865,868-869,872-873,876-877,880-881,884-885,888-889,892-893,896,900,904,908,912,916,920,924,928-9"
> > + "29,932-933,936-937,940-941,944-945,948-949,952-953,956-957,960,964,968,972,976,980,984,988,992-993,996-997,1000-"
> > + "1001,1004-1005,1008-1009,1012-1013,1016-1017,1020-1021,1024,1028,1032,1036,1040,1044,1048,1052,1056-1057,1060-10"
> > + "61,1064-1065,1068-1069,1072-1073,1076-1077,1080-1081,1084-1085,1088,1092,1096,1100,1104,1108,1112,1116,1120-1121"
> > + ",1124-1125,1128-1129,1132-1133,1136-1137,1140-1141,1144-1145,1148-1149,1152,1156,1160,1164,1168,1172,1176,1180,1"
> > + "184-1185,1188-1189,1192-1193,1196-1197,1200-1201,1204-1205,1208-1209,1212-1213,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1236,124"
> > + "0,1244,1248-1249,1252-1253,1256-1257,1260-1261,1264-1265,1268-1269,1272-1273,1276-1277,1280,1284,1288,1292,1296,"
> > + "1300,1304,1308,1312-1313,1316-1317,1320-1321,1324-1325,1328-1329,1332-1333,1336-1337,1340-1341,1344,1348,1352,13"
> > + "56,1360,1364,1368,1372,1376-1377,1380-1381,1384-1385,1388-1389,1392-1393,1396-1397,1400-1401,1404-1405,1408,1412"
> > + ",1416,1420,1424,1428,1432,1436,1440-1441,1444-1445,1448-1449,1452-1453,1456-1457,1460-1461,1464-1465,1468-1469,1"
> > + "472,1476,1480,1484,1488,1492,1496,1500,1504-1505,1508-1509,1512-1513,1516-1517,1520-1521,1524-1525,1528-1529,153"
> > + "2-1533,1536,1540,1544,1548,1552,1556,1560,1564,1568-1569,1572-1573,1576-1577,1580-1581,1584-1585,1588-1589,1592-"
> > + "1593,1596-1597,1600,1604,1608,1612,1616,1620,1624,1628,1632-1633,1636-1637,1640-1641,1644-1645,1648-1649,1652-16"
> > + "53,1656-1657,1660-1661,1664,1668,1672,1676,1680,1684,1688,1692,1696-1697,1700-1701,1704-1705,1708-1709,1712-1713"
> > + ",1716-1717,1720-1721,1724-1725,1728,1732,1736,1740,1744,1748,1752,1756,1760-1761,1764-1765,1768-1769,1772-1773,1"
> > + "776-1777,1780-1781,1784-1785,1788-1789,1792,1796,1800,1804,1808,1812,1816,1820,1824-1825,1828-1829,1832-1833,183"
> > + "6-1837,1840-1841,1844-1845,1848-1849,1852-1853,1856,1860,1864,1868,1872,1876,1880,1884,1888-1889,1892-1893,1896-"
> > + "1897,1900-1901,1904-1905,1908-1909,1912-1913,1916-1917,1920,1924,1928,1932,1936,1940,1944,1948,1952-1953,1956-19"
> > + "57,1960-1961,1964-1965,1968-1969,1972-1973,1976-1977,1980-1981,1984,1988,1992,1996,2000,2004,2008,2012,2016-2017"
> > + ",2020-2021,2024-2025,2028-2029,2032-2033,2036-2037,2040-2041,2044-2045,2048,2052,2056,2060,2064,2068,2072,2076,2"
> > + "080-2081,2084-2085,2088-2089,2092-2093,2096-2097,2100-2101,2104-2105,2108-2109,2112,2116,2120,2124,2128,2132,213"
> > + "6,2140,2144-2145,2148-2149,2152-2153,2156-2157,2160-2161,2164-2165,2168-2169,2172-2173,2176,2180,2184,2188,2192,"
> > + "2196,2200,2204,2208-2209,2212-2213,2216-2217,2220-2221,2224-2225,2228-2229,2232-2233,2236-2237,2240,2244,2248,22"
> > + "52,2256,2260,2264,2268,2272-2273,2276-2277,2280-2281,2284-2285,2288-2289,2292-2293,2296-2297,2300-2301,2304,2308"
> > + ",2312,2316,2320,2324,2328,2332,2336-2337,2340-2341,2344-2345,2348-2349,2352-2353,2356-2357,2360-2361,2364-2365,2"
> > + "368,2372,2376,2380,2384,2388,2392,2396,2400-2401,2404-2405,2408-2409,2412-2413,2416-2417,2420-2421,2424-2425,242"
> > + "8-2429,2432,2436,2440,2444,2448,2452,2456,2460,2464-2465,2468-2469,2472-2473,2476-2477,2480-2481,2484-2485,2488-"
> > + "2489,2492-2493,2496,2500,2504,2508,2512,2516,2520,2524,2528-2529,2532-2533,2536-2537,2540-2541,2544-2545,2548-25"
> > + "49,2552-2553,2556-2557\n";
> > +
> > +static const struct test_bitmap_print test_print[] __initconst = {
> > + { small_bitmap, sizeof(small_bitmap) * BITS_PER_BYTE, small_mask, small_list },
> > + { large_bitmap, sizeof(large_bitmap) * BITS_PER_BYTE, large_mask, large_list },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void __init test_bitmap_print_buf(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_print); i++) {
> > + const struct test_bitmap_print *t = &test_print[i];
> > + int n;
> > +
> > + n = bitmap_print_to_buf(false, print_buf, t->bitmap, t->nbits,
> > + 0, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> > + expect_eq_uint(strlen(t->mask) + 1, n);
> > + expect_eq_str(t->mask, print_buf, n);
> > +
> > + n = bitmap_print_to_buf(true, print_buf, t->bitmap, t->nbits,
> > + 0, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
> > + expect_eq_uint(strlen(t->list) + 1, n);
> > + expect_eq_str(t->list, print_buf, n);
> > +
> > + /* test bitmap_print_to_buf by non-zero offset */
> > + if (strlen(t->list) > PAGE_SIZE) {
> > + n = bitmap_print_to_buf(true, print_buf, t->bitmap, t->nbits,
> > + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + expect_eq_uint(strlen(t->list) + 1 - PAGE_SIZE, n);
> > + expect_eq_str(t->list + PAGE_SIZE, print_buf, n);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __init selftest(void)
> > {
> > test_zero_clear();
> > @@ -672,6 +821,7 @@ static void __init selftest(void)
> > test_mem_optimisations();
> > test_for_each_set_clump8();
> > test_bitmap_cut();
> > + test_bitmap_print_buf();
> > }
> >
> > KSTM_MODULE_LOADERS(test_bitmap);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 11:58 [PATCH v7 0/4] use bin_attribute to break the size limitation of cpumap ABI Barry Song
2021-07-15 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_to_buf to support large bitmask and list Barry Song
2021-07-15 15:28 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-15 21:08 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-16 0:57 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-15 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] topology: use bin_attribute to break the size limitation of cpumap ABI Barry Song
2021-07-16 8:49 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-16 20:04 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-17 0:16 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-17 1:12 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-19 9:07 ` andriy.shevchenko
2021-07-19 11:10 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-19 17:10 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-21 9:30 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-15 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] drivers/base/node.c: " Barry Song
2021-07-15 11:58 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] lib: test_bitmap: add bitmap_print_to_buf test cases Barry Song
2021-07-15 12:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-15 20:47 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2021-07-15 21:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-15 23:23 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-16 0:41 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-21 11:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-22 17:09 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-22 17:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-22 18:27 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-22 18:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-22 18:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-28 9:08 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-07-28 9:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-15 15:36 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-28 13:41 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] use bin_attribute to break the size limitation of cpumap ABI Greg KH
2021-07-28 14:53 ` Yury Norov
2021-07-28 15:25 ` Greg KH
2021-07-28 18:58 ` [PATCH] bitmap: extend comment to bitmap_print_to_buf Yury Norov
2021-07-29 6:04 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPCe+f3GPDUuvwnW@yury-ThinkPad \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=jianpeng.ma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.