Re: [RFC PATCH v0 1/2] spapr: Add H_REG_SNS hcall

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:56:13PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:49:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:02:27PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
[snip]
> > > diff --git a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > index 9f18fa090f..d72739126a 100644
> > > --- a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > +++ b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > @@ -470,6 +470,12 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
> > >  #define KVM_PPC_CPU_BEHAV_BNDS_CHK_SPEC_BAR	(1ULL << 61)
> > >  #define KVM_PPC_CPU_BEHAV_FLUSH_COUNT_CACHE	(1ull << 58)
> > >  
> > > +/* For KVM_PPC_SET_SNS */
> > > +struct kvm_ppc_sns_reg {
> > > +	__u64 addr;
> > > +	__u64 len;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > 
> > Updates to linux-headers/ should be done as a separate preliminary
> > patch, listing the specific kernel commit that you're updating too.
> 
> Yes, I am aware of it. Since the kernel patches are still in RFC
> state, I noted this as a TODO in patch description :-)

Sorry, I missed that.  In general, even for draft posts, I'd suggest
doing the linux-headers/ updates as a separate patch (but you can
construct that ad-hoc).

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]