From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EB4C43216 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BEB6023E for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:14:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E3BEB6023E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B537289C3F; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0470E6E8FE; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f1db90092f0c5d5424adff0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1d:b900:92f0:c5d5:424a:dff0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 18F4D1EC03D5; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1628965930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=wF+abY2BQsJbjTrcR+vEXegmF8fSVZNnTVHwv8EJcnQ=; b=E4Qk5UWHuniXg4G1qquKyzpgwZxdDOaCXRqHrAIJykq2qzFHsvToSzhtSszwEfmGfSV6v2 I5QqIZa+pz8OAA9XFKUyZCM9wxA5OIK4n52a7NMv/GJIh9ii9QfkxahlKZf58K1pY/P4Uq 2W5ojEdMC06o3XDrAinHQLW8qtTO9aY= Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Tom Lendacky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh , Joerg Roedel , Andi Kleen , Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy , Tianyu Lan , Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Message-ID: References: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:13:01 +0000 X-BeenThere: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AMD gfx List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "amd-gfx" On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > In prep for other protected virtualization technologies, introduce a > generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), that can be used to check > for specific protection attributes, like memory encryption. This is > intended to eliminate having to add multiple technology-specific checks > to the code (e.g. if (sev_active() || tdx_active())). > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel > Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > --- > arch/Kconfig | 3 +++ > include/linux/protected_guest.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/linux/protected_guest.h > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 98db63496bab..bd4f60c581f1 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -1231,6 +1231,9 @@ config RELR > config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT > bool > > +config ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST > + bool > + > config HAVE_SPARSE_SYSCALL_NR > bool > help > diff --git a/include/linux/protected_guest.h b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..43d4dde94793 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Tom Lendacky > + */ > + > +#ifndef _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > +#define _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > + > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do you really need that guard? It builds fine without it too. Or something coming later does need it...? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mEyS8-00ESad-83 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:20 +0000 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Message-ID: References: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tom Lendacky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh , Joerg Roedel , Andi Kleen , Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy , Tianyu Lan , Joerg Roedel On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > In prep for other protected virtualization technologies, introduce a > generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), that can be used to check > for specific protection attributes, like memory encryption. This is > intended to eliminate having to add multiple technology-specific checks > to the code (e.g. if (sev_active() || tdx_active())). > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel > Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > --- > arch/Kconfig | 3 +++ > include/linux/protected_guest.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/linux/protected_guest.h > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 98db63496bab..bd4f60c581f1 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -1231,6 +1231,9 @@ config RELR > config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT > bool > > +config ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST > + bool > + > config HAVE_SPARSE_SYSCALL_NR > bool > help > diff --git a/include/linux/protected_guest.h b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..43d4dde94793 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Tom Lendacky > + */ > + > +#ifndef _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > +#define _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > + > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do you really need that guard? It builds fine without it too. Or something coming later does need it...? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39EC4338F for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB4160F39 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9DB4160F39 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C84400EA; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9iSRHv26g84; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A846440100; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDA7C001C; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BDFC0010 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2B4403D6 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1veZ3_gNUYlw for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBA1403D1 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f1db90092f0c5d5424adff0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1d:b900:92f0:c5d5:424a:dff0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 18F4D1EC03D5; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1628965930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=wF+abY2BQsJbjTrcR+vEXegmF8fSVZNnTVHwv8EJcnQ=; b=E4Qk5UWHuniXg4G1qquKyzpgwZxdDOaCXRqHrAIJykq2qzFHsvToSzhtSszwEfmGfSV6v2 I5QqIZa+pz8OAA9XFKUyZCM9wxA5OIK4n52a7NMv/GJIh9ii9QfkxahlKZf58K1pY/P4Uq 2W5ojEdMC06o3XDrAinHQLW8qtTO9aY= Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Message-ID: References: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh , kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen , linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Joerg Roedel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tianyu Lan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > In prep for other protected virtualization technologies, introduce a > generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), that can be used to check > for specific protection attributes, like memory encryption. This is > intended to eliminate having to add multiple technology-specific checks > to the code (e.g. if (sev_active() || tdx_active())). > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel > Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > --- > arch/Kconfig | 3 +++ > include/linux/protected_guest.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/linux/protected_guest.h > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 98db63496bab..bd4f60c581f1 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -1231,6 +1231,9 @@ config RELR > config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT > bool > > +config ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST > + bool > + > config HAVE_SPARSE_SYSCALL_NR > bool > help > diff --git a/include/linux/protected_guest.h b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..43d4dde94793 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Tom Lendacky > + */ > + > +#ifndef _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > +#define _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > + > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do you really need that guard? It builds fine without it too. Or something coming later does need it...? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661A3C4338F for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E1C604D7 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 86E1C604D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gn8F54BrBz3cHc for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 04:33:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=E4Qk5UWH; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de (client-ip=2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457; helo=mail.skyhub.de; envelope-from=bp@alien8.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=E4Qk5UWH; dkim-atps=neutral X-Greylist: delayed 11266 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 04:32:28 AEST Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gn8DD1VtRz30CX for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 04:32:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f1db90092f0c5d5424adff0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1d:b900:92f0:c5d5:424a:dff0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 18F4D1EC03D5; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1628965930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=wF+abY2BQsJbjTrcR+vEXegmF8fSVZNnTVHwv8EJcnQ=; b=E4Qk5UWHuniXg4G1qquKyzpgwZxdDOaCXRqHrAIJykq2qzFHsvToSzhtSszwEfmGfSV6v2 I5QqIZa+pz8OAA9XFKUyZCM9wxA5OIK4n52a7NMv/GJIh9ii9QfkxahlKZf58K1pY/P4Uq 2W5ojEdMC06o3XDrAinHQLW8qtTO9aY= Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:32:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Message-ID: References: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482fe51f1671c1cd081039801b03db7ec0036332.1628873970.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen , linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Joerg Roedel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tianyu Lan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > In prep for other protected virtualization technologies, introduce a > generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), that can be used to check > for specific protection attributes, like memory encryption. This is > intended to eliminate having to add multiple technology-specific checks > to the code (e.g. if (sev_active() || tdx_active())). > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel > Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > --- > arch/Kconfig | 3 +++ > include/linux/protected_guest.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/linux/protected_guest.h > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 98db63496bab..bd4f60c581f1 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -1231,6 +1231,9 @@ config RELR > config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT > bool > > +config ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST > + bool > + > config HAVE_SPARSE_SYSCALL_NR > bool > help > diff --git a/include/linux/protected_guest.h b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..43d4dde94793 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/protected_guest.h > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > + * > + * Author: Tom Lendacky > + */ > + > +#ifndef _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > +#define _PROTECTED_GUEST_H > + > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do you really need that guard? It builds fine without it too. Or something coming later does need it...? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette