From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH regression fix] gpiolib: acpi: Make set-debounce-timeout failures non fatal
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:25:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRo9A0sgfKbi94BK@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816093856.12313-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:38:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Commit 8dcb7a15a585 ("gpiolib: acpi: Take into account debounce settings")
> made the gpiolib-acpi code call gpio_set_debounce_timeout() when requesting
> GPIOs.
>
> This in itself is fine, but it also made gpio_set_debounce_timeout()
> errors fatal, causing the requesting of the GPIO to fail. This is causing
> regressions. E.g. on a HP ElitePad 1000 G2 various _AEI specified GPIO
> ACPI event sources specify a debouncy timeout of 20 ms, but the
> pinctrl-baytrail.c only supports certain fixed values, the closest
> ones being 12 or 14 ms and pinctrl-baytrail.c responds with -EINVAL
> when specified a value which is not one of the fixed values.
>
> This is causing the acpi_request_own_gpiod() call to fail for 3
> ACPI event sources on the HP ElitePad 1000 G2, which in turn is causing
> e.g. the battery charging vs discharging status to never get updated,
> even though a charger has been plugged-in or unplugged.
>
> Make gpio_set_debounce_timeout() errors non fatal, warning about the
> failure instead, to fix this regression.
>
> Note we should probably also fix various pinctrl drivers to just
> pick the first bigger discrete value rather then returning -EINVAL but
> this will need to be done on a per driver basis, where as this fix
> at least gets us back to where things were before and thus restores
> functionality on devices where this was lost due to
> gpio_set_debounce_timeout() errors.
>
> Fixes: 8dcb7a15a585 ("gpiolib: acpi: Take into account debounce settings")
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 9:38 [PATCH regression fix] gpiolib: acpi: Make set-debounce-timeout failures non fatal Hans de Goede
2021-08-16 10:25 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2021-08-16 10:39 ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-21 18:28 ` Linus Walleij
2021-09-21 18:42 ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-22 9:17 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-09-22 10:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-22 12:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRo9A0sgfKbi94BK@lahna \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.