From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, TimGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com,
CooperYan@zhaoxin.com, QiyuanWang@zhaoxin.com,
HerryYang@zhaoxin.com, CobeChen@zhaoxin.com,
YanchenSun@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Fix set RTC time delay 500ms on some Zhaoxin SOCs
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:36:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRpb4Fey2lM3aOAw@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4b6b0b4-9aa5-9a75-e523-0fd7656b82cf@zhaoxin.com>
On 16/08/2021 18:03:13+0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
>
> On 16/08/2021 16:24, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 16/08/2021 21:47:18+0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> >> When the RTC divider is changed from reset to an operating time base,
> >> the first update cycle should be 500ms later. But on some Zhaoxin SOCs,
> >> this first update cycle is one second later.
> >>
> >> So set RTC time on these Zhaoxin SOCs will causing 500ms delay.
> >>
> >
> > Can you explain what is the relationship between writing the divider and
> > the 500ms delay?
> >> Isn't the issue that you are using systohc and set_offset_nsec is set to
> > NSEC_PER_SEC / 2 ?
> >
> No.
> When using #hwclock -s to set RTC time and set_offset_nsec is
> NSEC_PER_SEC / 2, the function mc146818_set_time() requires the first
> update cycle after RTC divider be changed from reset to an operating
> mode is 500ms as the MC146818A spec specified. But on some Zhaoxin SOCs,
> the first update cycle of RTC is one second later after RTC divider be
> changed from reset to an operating mode. So the first update cycle after
> RTC divider be changed from reset to an operation mode on These SOCs
> will causing 500ms delay with current mc146818_set_time() implementation.
>
What happens with hwclock --delay=0 -s ?
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 13:47 [PATCH] rtc: Fix set RTC time delay 500ms on some Zhaoxin SOCs Tony W Wang-oc
2021-08-16 8:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-16 10:03 ` Tony W Wang-oc
2021-08-16 12:36 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2021-08-17 11:09 ` tonywwang-oc
2021-08-17 13:21 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-18 3:54 ` tonywwang-oc
2021-10-26 11:42 ` tonywwang-oc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-17 9:10 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRpb4Fey2lM3aOAw@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=CooperYan@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=HerryYang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=QiyuanWang@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=TimGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=TonyWWang-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=YanchenSun@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.