From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, ch@denx.de,
Joe Hung <joe_hung@ilitek.com>, Luca Hsu <luca_hsu@ilitek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: ili210x - add ili251x firmware update support
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:14:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YS1KLkCX01tlHBcy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210827211258.318618-3-marex@denx.de>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The ili251x firmware can be updated, this is used when switching between
> different modes of operation of the touch surface, e.g. glove operation.
> This patch implements the firmware update mechanism triggered by a write
> of firmware name into an sysfs attribute.
>
> The firmware itself is distributed as an intel hex file with non-standard
> types. The first two lines are of type 0xad, which indicates the start of
> DataFlash payload, that is always at address 0xf000 on the ili251x, so it
> can be dropped, and 0xac which indicates the position of firmware info in
> the Application payload, that is always at address 0x2020 on the ili251x
> and we do not care. The rest of the firmware is data of type 0x00, and we
> care about that. To convert the firmware hex file into something usable
> by the kernel, remove the first two lines and then use ihex2fw:
>
> $ tail -n +3 input.hex > temp.hex
> $ ./tools/firmware/ihex2fw temp.hex firmware/touch.bin
>
> To trigger the firmware update, place touch.bin or whichever file name
> you pick into /lib/firmware/, write that zero terminated file name into
> firmware_update sysfs attribute, wait about 30-40 seconds. The firmware
> update is slow. Then verify firmware_version and mode sysfs attributes
> to verify whether the firmware got updated and the controller switched
> back to application (AP) mode by reading out firmware_version attribute
> in sysfs.
>
> Note that the content of firmware_version, e.g. 0600.0005.abcd.aa04 can
> be matched to the content of the firmware hex file. The first four bytes,
> 0x06 0x00 0x00 0x05 can be found at ^:102030 00 05000006, the next four
> bytes 0xab 0xcd 0xaa 0x04 at ^:10F000 00 nnnnnnnn ABCDAA04.
>
> Note that the protocol differs considerably between the ili2xxx devices,
> this patch therefore implements this functionality only for ili251x that
> I can test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Joe Hung <joe_hung@ilitek.com>
> Cc: Luca Hsu <luca_hsu@ilitek.com>
> ---
> V2: - Rename REG_IC_MODE to REG_GET_MODE, since it is pair command to REG_SET_MODE
> - Replace 0xc7 in code with REG_READ_DATA_CRC macro
> - Handle firmware name with newline at the end
> - Update X and Y resolution after firmware update, the FW could have
> changed the resolution
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> index ad454cd2855a..4d34043cdf01 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_HYCON_HY46XX
> config TOUCHSCREEN_ILI210X
> tristate "Ilitek ILI210X based touchscreen"
> depends on I2C
> + select CRC_CCITT
> help
> Say Y here if you have a ILI210X based touchscreen
> controller. This driver supports models ILI2102,
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> index 7790ad000dc1..c4a9bd3f67e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#include <linux/crc-ccitt.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/ihex.h>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/input/mt.h>
> #include <linux/input/touchscreen.h>
> @@ -25,9 +27,14 @@
> #define REG_FIRMWARE_VERSION 0x40
> #define REG_PROTOCOL_VERSION 0x42
> #define REG_KERNEL_VERSION 0x61
> -#define REG_IC_MODE 0xc0
> -#define REG_IC_MODE_AP 0x5a
> -#define REG_IC_MODE_BL 0x55
> +#define REG_GET_MODE 0xc0
> +#define REG_GET_MODE_AP 0x5a
> +#define REG_GET_MODE_BL 0x55
> +#define REG_SET_MODE_AP 0xc1
> +#define REG_SET_MODE_BL 0xc2
> +#define REG_WRITE_DATA 0xc3
> +#define REG_WRITE_ENABLE 0xc4
> +#define REG_READ_DATA_CRC 0xc7
> #define REG_CALIBRATE 0xcc
>
> struct ili2xxx_chip {
> @@ -445,15 +452,15 @@ static ssize_t ili251x_mode_show(struct device *dev,
>
> /* Get mode */
> mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> - ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_IC_MODE, &md, sizeof(md));
> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_GET_MODE, &md, sizeof(md));
> mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
>
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (md[0] == REG_IC_MODE_AP) /* Application Mode */
> + if (md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_AP) /* Application Mode */
> mode = "AP";
> - else if (md[0] == REG_IC_MODE_BL) /* BootLoader Mode */
> + else if (md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_BL) /* BootLoader Mode */
> mode = "BL";
> else /* Unknown Mode */
g> mode = "??";
> @@ -488,8 +495,312 @@ static ssize_t ili210x_calibrate(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(calibrate, S_IWUSR, NULL, ili210x_calibrate);
>
> +static int ili251x_firmware_to_buffer(struct device *dev,
> + const char *fwname, u8 **buf,
> + u16 *ac_end, u16 *df_end)
> +{
> + const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
> + const struct ihex_binrec *rec;
> + u32 fw_addr, fw_last_addr = 0;
> + u16 fw_len;
> + u8 *fw_buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = request_ihex_firmware(&fw, fwname, dev);
Let's call variables that carry error code or 0 as success 'error' and
reserve 'ret' for cases when there can be actual data.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request firmware %s, ret=%d\n", fwname, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The firmware ihex blob can never be bigger than 64 kiB, so make this
> + * simple -- allocate a 64 kiB buffer, iterate over the ihex blob records
> + * once, copy them all into this buffer at the right locations, and then
> + * do all operations on this linear buffer.
> + */
> + fw_buf = kcalloc(1, SZ_64K, GFP_KERNEL);
Why kcalloc and not kzalloc?
> + if (!fw_buf) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_alloc;
> + }
> +
> + rec = (const struct ihex_binrec *)fw->data;
> + while (rec) {
> + fw_addr = be32_to_cpu(rec->addr);
> + fw_len = be16_to_cpu(rec->len);
> +
> + if (fw_addr + fw_len > SZ_64K) {
> + ret = -EFBIG;
> + goto err_big;
> + }
> +
> + /* Find the last address before DF start address, that is AC end */
> + if (fw_addr == 0xf000)
> + *ac_end = fw_last_addr;
> + fw_last_addr = fw_addr + fw_len;
> +
> + memcpy(fw_buf + fw_addr, rec->data, fw_len);
> + rec = ihex_next_binrec(rec);
> + }
> +
> + /* DF end address is the last address in the firmware blob */
> + *df_end = fw_addr + fw_len;
> + *buf = fw_buf;
> + release_firmware(fw);
> + return 0;
> +err_big:
> + kfree(fw_buf);
> +err_alloc:
> + release_firmware(fw);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Switch mode between Application and BootLoader */
> +static int ili251x_switch_ic_mode(struct i2c_client *client, u8 cmd_mode)
> +{
> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u8 cmd_wren[3] = { REG_WRITE_ENABLE, 0x5a, 0xa5 };
> + u8 md[2];
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_GET_MODE, md, sizeof(md));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + /* Mode already set */
> + if ((cmd_mode == REG_SET_MODE_AP && md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_AP) ||
> + (cmd_mode == REG_SET_MODE_BL && md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_BL))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Unlock writes */
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, cmd_wren, sizeof(cmd_wren));
> + if (ret != sizeof(cmd_wren))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mdelay(20);
> +
> + /* Select mode (BootLoader or Application) */
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, &cmd_mode, 1);
> + if (ret != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mdelay(200); /* Reboot into bootloader takes a lot of time ... */
> +
> + /* Read back mode */
> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_GET_MODE, md, sizeof(md));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + /* Check if mode is correct now. */
> + if ((cmd_mode == REG_SET_MODE_AP && md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_AP) ||
> + (cmd_mode == REG_SET_MODE_BL && md[0] == REG_GET_MODE_BL))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int ili251x_firmware_busy(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int ret, i = 0;
> + u8 data;
> +
> + do {
> + /* The read_reg already contains suitable delay */
> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, 0x80, &data, 1);
Can we have symbolic name for this register (and others).
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + if (i++ == 100000)
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + } while (data != 0x50);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ili251x_firmware_write_to_ic(struct device *dev, u8 *fwbuf,
> + u16 start, u16 end, u8 dataflash)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + u8 cmd_crc = REG_READ_DATA_CRC;
> + u8 crcrb[4] = { 0 };
> + u8 fw_data[33];
> + u16 fw_addr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The DF (dataflash) needs 2 bytes offset for unknown reasons,
> + * the AC (application) has 2 bytes CRC16-CCITT at the end.
> + */
> + u16 crc = crc_ccitt(0, fwbuf + start + (dataflash ? 2 : 0),
> + end - start - 2);
> +
> + /* Unlock write to either AC (application) or DF (dataflash) area */
> + u8 cmd_wr[10] = {
> + REG_WRITE_ENABLE, 0x5a, 0xa5, dataflash,
> + (end >> 16) & 0xff, (end >> 8) & 0xff, end & 0xff,
> + (crc >> 16) & 0xff, (crc >> 8) & 0xff, crc & 0xff
> + };
> +
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, cmd_wr, sizeof(cmd_wr));
> + if (ret != sizeof(cmd_wr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_busy(client);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + for (fw_addr = start; fw_addr < end; fw_addr += 32) {
> + fw_data[0] = REG_WRITE_DATA;
> + memcpy(&(fw_data[1]), fwbuf + fw_addr, 32);
Is it guaranteed that we have enough data (32 bytes) and we will not
reach past the buffer?
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, fw_data, 33);
> + if (ret != sizeof(fw_data))
> + return ret;
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_busy(client);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, &cmd_crc, 1);
> + if (ret != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_busy(client);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_READ_DATA_CRC,
> + &crcrb, sizeof(crcrb));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Check CRC readback */
> + if ((crcrb[0] != (crc & 0xff)) || crcrb[1] != ((crc >> 8) & 0xff))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ili251x_firmware_reset(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + u8 cmd_reset[2] = { 0xf2, 0x01 };
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, cmd_reset, sizeof(cmd_reset));
> + if (ret != sizeof(cmd_reset))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return ili251x_firmware_busy(client);
> +}
> +
> +static void ili251x_hardware_reset(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + /* Reset the controller */
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
> + usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
> + msleep(300);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t ili210x_firmware_update_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + char fwname[NAME_MAX];
> + u16 ac_end, df_end;
> + u8 *fwbuf;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (count >= NAME_MAX) {
> + dev_err(dev, "File name too long\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(fwname, buf, count);
> + if (fwname[count - 1] == '\n')
> + fwname[count - 1] = '\0';
> + else
> + fwname[count] = '\0';
I believe the practice is to use constant firmware name based on driver
or chip name. If there is desire to allow dynamic firmware name for
given device I think it should be handled at firmware loader core.
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_to_buffer(dev, fwname, &fwbuf, &ac_end, &df_end);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "Firmware update started, firmware=%s\n", fwname);
dev_dbg() please.
> +
> + ili251x_hardware_reset(dev);
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_reset(client);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + /* This may not succeed on first try, so re-try a few times. */
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + ret = ili251x_switch_ic_mode(client, REG_SET_MODE_BL);
> + if (!ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "IC is now in BootLoader mode\n");
> +
> + msleep(200); /* The bootloader seems to need some time too. */
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_write_to_ic(dev, fwbuf, 0xf000, df_end, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "DF firmware update failed, ret=%d\n", ret);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "DataFlash firmware written\n");
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_write_to_ic(dev, fwbuf, 0x2000, ac_end, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "AC firmware update failed, ret=%d\n", ret);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "Application firmware written\n");
> +
> + /* This may not succeed on first try, so re-try a few times. */
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + ret = ili251x_switch_ic_mode(client, REG_SET_MODE_AP);
> + if (!ret)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "IC is now in Application mode\n");
> +
> + ret = ili251x_firmware_update_resolution(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = count;
> +
> +exit:
> + ili251x_hardware_reset(dev);
> + dev_info(dev, "Firmware update ended, ret=%i\n", ret);
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> + kfree(fwbuf);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(firmware_update, 0200, NULL, ili210x_firmware_update_store);
> +
> static struct attribute *ili210x_attributes[] = {
> &dev_attr_calibrate.attr,
> + &dev_attr_firmware_update.attr,
> &dev_attr_firmware_version.attr,
> &dev_attr_kernel_version.attr,
> &dev_attr_protocol_version.attr,
> --
> 2.32.0
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 21:12 [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: ili210x - use resolution from ili251x firmware Marek Vasut
2021-08-27 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: ili210x - export ili251x version details via sysfs Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:02 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:33 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-27 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: ili210x - add ili251x firmware update support Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 21:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2021-08-30 23:27 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-31 2:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: ili210x - use resolution from ili251x firmware Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 22:49 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:31 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-31 0:01 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YS1KLkCX01tlHBcy@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=ch@denx.de \
--cc=joe_hung@ilitek.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca_hsu@ilitek.com \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.