From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310FAC4338F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EACCD613A3 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org EACCD613A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.170264.311013 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mI6Kh-0002U2-VQ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:31 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 170264.311013; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mI6Kh-0002Tv-Rr; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:31 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 170264; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:30 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mI6Kg-0002To-Fq for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:30 +0000 Received: from esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.175]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 825fd8e9-90e7-457d-ba38-58c349d04a25; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:33:28 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 825fd8e9-90e7-457d-ba38-58c349d04a25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1629711208; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=K+2dEHEQQZycdvhuyp9PYKX6j5tG3GT18k9oIBc13hs=; b=DHMzkAmV1ib1FgjiEsWdOQAuEz1I1FQJcuzTzPraKJ1+ihiueYo+JuYu bpHK8AaycXq6ARzzz7yjphFHYfRL4WJfeE84wJlFfOAyc0qCuWW2Kne7R 756GlIT9y+WeBuiLfS+o8wVhPWnzkFlmZIlZbFdFEkGxZg/9eWmeTXraV 4=; Authentication-Results: esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: yyLdlr/SNROMQXTYXTS5rlSNSroHXNPEzbFLlBcBzUgQxKiK9+oRo5sZrhhctEHECs2GwcBVw6 +Bln1IMCWOWpQA11h4Pi5dWHqO0xuQr+NAeEqdgCIF1teXzumMtp4HGgwnIMq9l47Omv5Ye6iW FUYaHRtm1XCmbRXMWkpqQ7xREiRrUu+SfxfX1CowHk5v/pECrO2Y5MVQi9SRsoyUe7z87tfa6u NEn4CGdJoHhvk3ARQyeBwdLbtrqOyJcIHmbJLCrWz4SS+wWn5p8EETAy49pURUxGSavmsyoe0R ZjI0ol2biqVABrfiAT2F/E3z X-SBRS: 5.1 X-MesageID: 51069041 X-Ironport-Server: esa6.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.156.83 X-Policy: $RELAYED IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:mPruz6MTPMiHOsBcTs+jsMiBIKoaSvp037BL7SxMoHluGfBw+P rAoB1273HJYVQqOE3I6OrgBEDoexq1n/NICOIqTNSftWfdyQ6VBbAnwYz+wyDxXw3Sn9QtsZ uIqpIOauHNMQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,344,1620705600"; d="scan'208";a="51069041" Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:33:25 +0100 From: Anthony PERARD To: Jan Beulich CC: Ian Jackson , osstest service owner , Subject: Re: [xen-4.12-testing bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 Message-ID: References: <9e009e5d-41cf-71de-fed4-88a962b4ab66@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9e009e5d-41cf-71de-fed4-88a962b4ab66@suse.com> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:07:32AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 23.08.2021 02:40, osstest service owner wrote: > > commit d06eb2d1d9dd8da1ed84bd08c5783a0264fe2b64 > > Author: Laszlo Ersek > > Date: Wed May 26 22:14:24 2021 +0200 > > > > OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: remove Xen support > > Uniformly from 4.15 through to 4.12 (the latter of which shouldn't have > been affected by whatever has been pulled in in the first place, given > it's a security-only branch, but with the OVMF commit to use being > hardcoded in ./Config.mk I don't really understand how a possible > change to the OVMF tree could have affected this version) tests are > now failing, everywhere with the above bisection result. Given that we > want to get out releases from the 4.15 and 4.13 branches right after > the batch of XSAs going public on Wednesday, something needs to be > done about this pretty soon. > > Does osstest override ./Config.mk's choice? Albeit I guess even if it > does that's not outright wrong, and instead it would be bad if the > older versions wouldn't work anymore with an updated OVMF. Yes, osstest uses "xen-tested-master" branch since c9d1e5896fe2 ("cr-daily-branch: ovmf: "usually" use xen-tested-master") for stable branches. We are going to need to backport a commit from unstable. Either aad7b5c11d51 ("tools/firmware/ovmf: Use OvmfXen platform file is exist") (but has been reverted) or 81f291420238 ("tools/firmware/ovmf: Use OvmfXen platform file if exist and update OVMF") (but it also changes the version of ovmf pulled by default, which we probably don't want to change) So I would suggest backporting aad7b5c11d51. Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD