From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E752F3FC2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 17UFJqve006314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:19:52 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 0897715C3E7E; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:19:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:19:51 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Alex Levin Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Linus Walleij , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: kSummit proposal - The Linux kernel in ChromeOS Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:01:04PM -0700, Alex Levin wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Linus and Laurent. > > We are willing to extend this to 90 minutes and cover the > opportunities and challenges we have WRT to SoC manufacturers > upstreaming and how ChromeOS is influencing upstreaming. > > I wasn't sure we will be accepted as a ksummit so it seems that the > track for now is a MC, but that might change. Kernel Summit sessions are only 45 minutes, but we do have plenty of time for BOF's. What MC track were you proposing this for? - Ted