From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF86C433EF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E01610E9 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 05:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347633AbhIHF5r (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:57:47 -0400 Received: from gw2.atmark-techno.com ([35.74.137.57]:34036 "EHLO gw2.atmark-techno.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233916AbhIHF5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 01:57:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f72.google.com (mail-pj1-f72.google.com [209.85.216.72]) by gw2.atmark-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74D9B20D6A for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:56:37 +0900 (JST) Received: by mail-pj1-f72.google.com with SMTP id mm23-20020a17090b359700b00185945eae0eso744315pjb.3 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:56:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=16Ef+9qt4mcc8tLdQbgm9Zrucoq1zFP1w6xO9x2EyR8=; b=FAuS8WaU2mcwI3rQqJ5emlAS0HQmEjTUVzkRfiu/MExfz+W0Ln5Hsb9ew6ewX3kHtO f8rTk6MSnsDGPg5787wSTQj6FYt9BrQWf8TcubK+gbwUKzq3PQhbGDJTtQCLKfUojax2 7bk9SzbYX2DjtGVxzkqB01A+Lgdho1cbUHb7+Ri+bKyxZabJfahQTpQScj13JJDVVkp/ GVcBti+cmC8vk5428C27u+A/1Lw2iUzb07tcACKwKUilMaehme2S71acqV1tgC6rusvr tVp4nqPsul82TiYJ88wV2bhM/ij7S3thdEDgRmIqOudsbqCqHJVIjmcsiDOz/S665OzV oBUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FAA7HROAJDzPcalR4+WD20/UHHrTp5jNNY2a9/aMyXlA9Fn0Y U46YgJchmXxZJ+FfaW29E+NaM9Dlw93aNDyeP/ucCieoFWCZGYRXVO/cwcbpsB2eGX0+4Q5FJTf eixBHY3upbm4hcgCQjoc7Ieqy1MGl X-Received: by 2002:a62:2fc1:0:b0:3f5:176f:67c8 with SMTP id v184-20020a622fc1000000b003f5176f67c8mr1949255pfv.17.1631080596483; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:56:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn5G9NGH5IwIxpTFTylngnI0aD4LeWMOrPFS5WIk5+YNNbuTs7V0L1Z4oasH+TfJgEnW+T8w== X-Received: by 2002:a62:2fc1:0:b0:3f5:176f:67c8 with SMTP id v184-20020a622fc1000000b003f5176f67c8mr1949239pfv.17.1631080596299; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-0115 (178.101.200.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.200.101.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm891261pfv.209.2021.09.07.22.56.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from martinet by pc-0115 with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNqZW-00EPgo-Q3; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:56:34 +0900 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:56:24 +0900 From: Dominique MARTINET To: Sharvari Harisangam Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Amitkumar Karwar , Jonas =?utf-8?Q?Dre=C3=9Fler?= , Takashi Iwai , Tsuchiya Yuto , Geert Uytterhoeven , Arnd Bergmann , Lee Jones , Kalle Valo , Xinming Hu , Ganapathi Bhat Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: mwifiex cmd timeout on one pci variant Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Sharvari Harisangam wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:45:53AM +0000: > Use firmware from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/mrvl > for mwifiex driver. Thanks, that's the first firmware I was using; it's currently at 16.68.1.p179 which is why I'm surprised Jonas said the latest would be 15.68.19.p21. I think it's just a different variant of the driver now though, a binary grep matches 15.68.19.p21 for pcie8897_uapsta.bin but I my driver loads pcieuart8997_combo_v4.bin I hadn't noticed the first number didn't match, but that likely confirms it. Sorry for the noise on firmware version, I'm still interested in understanding why the command timeouts. -- Dominique Martinet