From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:44:57 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [COMMITTED] runtest/cve: Fix wrong cve tag In-Reply-To: <5b7f4a92-983f-2a7b-21f3-f9e2110bc0c2@suse.cz> References: <1630897958-2160-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <613864D4.5030400@fujitsu.com> <5b7f4a92-983f-2a7b-21f3-f9e2110bc0c2@suse.cz> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > > In fact, Look the following url: > > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-3609 > > > > It said nothing and seems this cve number doesn't exist. > > > > Do you know what happen? > > This vulnerability is tracked under this CVE number in SUSE Bugzilla and > RedHat security portal: > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187215 > https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2021-3609 > > I didn't check any "upstream" CVE databases. Looks like the CVE has been allocated though, so possibly somehow the the notification that it has been assigned has failed. I guess that RedHat security team should look into this. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E3BC433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F55861108 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:44:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9F55861108 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFD93C32BD for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 921A73C2266 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A05B1A0037B for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8882012D; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:44:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1631097884; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ilkbXsSXeAtUWjI1lMOqfQQC2bLHEBQrANTfjxeMmd0=; b=zs3SBFIRaSAR4yhPQixRSqlY6L0tcva2fxMYCFbCQNfU2pFilG01pQB0VhnggMeWRCF3kq ntA+msyn84/NyOZDwRB0UQavAikIHrrGy/VXSDfpzJIXXeh6N0Lc+KVIABHpA/fX8GZZVE bh4py7lDXJM3ZDafP5PMKXSOaffisdg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1631097884; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ilkbXsSXeAtUWjI1lMOqfQQC2bLHEBQrANTfjxeMmd0=; b=rUEseFpdGX24muwFvCYKhdUYv6W/YDS4ePt1ZKcEOJWLvEmFMPZwGTMgTtb9Q66exu7+pf 2mUkYZ9Ac9VQe0AQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0A613CC6; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id UMifFRyUOGFpTQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 08 Sep 2021 10:44:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:44:57 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: References: <1630897958-2160-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> <613864D4.5030400@fujitsu.com> <5b7f4a92-983f-2a7b-21f3-f9e2110bc0c2@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5b7f4a92-983f-2a7b-21f3-f9e2110bc0c2@suse.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [COMMITTED] runtest/cve: Fix wrong cve tag X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Message-ID: <20210908104457.CyQpyWInM8eFRHq_skPBPbkxyrIOUBQUbfFL4AoY4vM@z> Hi! > > In fact, Look the following url: > > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-3609 > > > > It said nothing and seems this cve number doesn't exist. > > > > Do you know what happen? > > This vulnerability is tracked under this CVE number in SUSE Bugzilla and > RedHat security portal: > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187215 > https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2021-3609 > > I didn't check any "upstream" CVE databases. Looks like the CVE has been allocated though, so possibly somehow the the notification that it has been assigned has failed. I guess that RedHat security team should look into this. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp