diff for duplicates of <YUkeOB3GfK6KO8KG@google.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index eab9d7e..0dc6fd2 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 04:29:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I only see the "tested with 5.14" that the regression was still there > -> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/034fc860-d0d0-0c61-09d2-3c41c4f020c6(a)intel.com/ +> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/034fc860-d0d0-0c61-09d2-3c41c4f020c6@intel.com/ > > I don't see a confirmation that this patch fixed it. > @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 04:29:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Or did I miss it? I have no idea why I couldn't find the reply from lore.kernel.org/lkml/ -The message id was 89e2b66b-c706-c020-bff5-b815dcd5c461(a)intel.com -in the thread(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210520083144.GD14190(a)xsang-OptiPlex-9020/) +The message id was 89e2b66b-c706-c020-bff5-b815dcd5c461@intel.com +in the thread(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210520083144.GD14190@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/) -Xing, Zhengjun zhengjun.xing(a)intel.com confirmed +Xing, Zhengjun zhengjun.xing@intel.com confirmed Quote - ``` diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fba759e..74293f9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,29 @@ + "ref\020210907212347.1977686-1-minchan@kernel.org\0" "ref\0CAHk-=wh2_yEuAC5=9VWefK+0JD9pAKf8qL-vpSmS7MtLA8SZEA@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fs: invalidate bh_lrus for only cold path\0" "Date\0Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:50:16 -0700\0" - "To\0lkp@lists.01.org\0" - "\01:1\0" + "To\0Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>" + " zhengjun.xing@intel.com\0" + "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>" + Laura Abbott <labbott@kernel.org> + Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com> + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + John Dias <joaodias@google.com> + Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> + Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> + Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> + Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> + LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org> + lkp@lists.01.org + kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> + Huang + Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> + Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> + zhengjun.xing@intel.com + " Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@codeaurora.org>\0" + "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 04:29:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:\n" "> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:\n" @@ -23,7 +43,7 @@ "> \n" "> I only see the \"tested with 5.14\" that the regression was still there\n" "> \n" - "> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/034fc860-d0d0-0c61-09d2-3c41c4f020c6(a)intel.com/\n" + "> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/034fc860-d0d0-0c61-09d2-3c41c4f020c6@intel.com/\n" "> \n" "> I don't see a confirmation that this patch fixed it.\n" "> \n" @@ -33,10 +53,10 @@ "> Or did I miss it?\n" "\n" "I have no idea why I couldn't find the reply from lore.kernel.org/lkml/\n" - "The message id was 89e2b66b-c706-c020-bff5-b815dcd5c461(a)intel.com\n" - "in the thread(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210520083144.GD14190(a)xsang-OptiPlex-9020/)\n" + "The message id was 89e2b66b-c706-c020-bff5-b815dcd5c461@intel.com\n" + "in the thread(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210520083144.GD14190@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/)\n" "\n" - "Xing, Zhengjun zhengjun.xing(a)intel.com confirmed \n" + "Xing, Zhengjun zhengjun.xing@intel.com confirmed \n" "\n" "Quote -\n" "```\n" @@ -52,4 +72,4 @@ "\n" Xing, could you confirm whether this patch fixes the regression? -624eda307cdf92b51356332aac374bf5e5f2b3ebfe4a68e2af575a23ae639747 +28ce73f5f924c49c94c7784f1a4c2ff283f73b237ce3690ea099e49914d84b0b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.