From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DD8C433F5 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 00:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E22761A4F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 00:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350830AbhJAAtx (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:49:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349760AbhJAAtw (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:49:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D31BC06176A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id bb10so5227079plb.2 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4VFDlYLCDJyTdCozdBjGZHP23jhQYYCHK/pXcPk42S0=; b=gYFLz3LdgLYwFnwXA1Eedz+KfOBoOx99Oh+oQknZE6PQsZSDxBJaNwh5FsEXDEDXsT j/PglNgseNhuwOLnAsJuRodyx0yjrplOktcZZxb8dXG+w77lvmJnI6oF3vTyi66lER/6 RvcFhWRBskx6vZqLULnRZHdktA0AR9dD5dcPQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4VFDlYLCDJyTdCozdBjGZHP23jhQYYCHK/pXcPk42S0=; b=qvYMp7AetHM4iRFcOpOv7ZXcN1Vvz6ygorDxSdMs2Y/Q+JpYX9VI3imid5JmmgXM6y C96RJIo3CNTdGEmGcvLCGj0ki8Qv/bFwJG6NaCL1/rzBf1k2IS+IWddHcbZ0vl6uE7tz pWfzGXk5f8PiI7EksjqNuzASG/M4GBCwr3kR2qIvpb4L/UZs0bxs1rN3PIgSWIy7rG+r IbAPBFaxn16uJUEPUpkdgKCx/2jVtHY6vWyqqRpOx5vZBBYbQ8u7nZhKtRLEbd0gA2N/ H8vie4DRiny25gwN3YiHY2sNsaJq/XCI9c3E9pZlO95BUi4JWOvMtg82x+HB0pvvLhJ+ FSbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lop+B0VmKn/ZDTbe2YuYG8LR9e2NqSThcRT3JF5i4KfhsUm/L pLF7BuM0ry75W69JMd7XD2/o8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxE1DlPGDTRxe6wL6rnFcH0YtVkmNvPTNX/VMYKVLXHUvgJ1DvUmwTYM47KUX1og/S6U0LoFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:10:: with SMTP id 16mr9849106pja.50.1633049288896; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2409:10:2e40:5100:159f:3ab6:88f:1129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm6307358pjq.13.2021.09.30.17.48.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:47:59 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: andreyknvl@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, ast@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, bp@alien8.de, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, davem@davemloft.net, dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, rth@twiddle.net, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Subject: Re: + kallsyms-remove-arch-specific-text-and-data-check.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: References: <20210930212149.TDvMQI9fl%akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210930212149.TDvMQI9fl%akpm@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org On (21/09/30 14:21), akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > +++ a/include/linux/kallsyms.h > @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ static inline int is_kernel_inittext(uns > > static inline int is_kernel_text(unsigned long addr) > { > - if ((addr >= (unsigned long)_stext && addr <= (unsigned long)_etext) || > - arch_is_kernel_text(addr)) > + if ((addr >= (unsigned long)_stext && addr <= (unsigned long)_etext)) > return 1; Does this need to include _etext or should it be '< _etext'?