All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:09:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXG6/f7tAV4+zYfy@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021184005.GV24307@magnolia>

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:40:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:39:59PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks
> > does not leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This
> > triggers assert failures and free space accounting corruption on
> > XFS.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > This test targets the problem addressed by the following patch in XFS:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20211021163330.1886516-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> >  tests/generic/651     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/generic/651.out |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/generic/651
> >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/651.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/651 b/tests/generic/651
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..8d4e6728
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/651
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 651
> > +#
> > +# Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks does not
> > +# leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This triggers assert
> > +# failures and free space accounting corruption on XFS.
> > +#
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > +	_cleanup_flakey
> > +	cd /
> > +	rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/reflink
> > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs generic
> > +_require_scratch_reflink
> > +_require_flakey_with_error_writes
> 
> _require_cp_reflink
> 
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> > +_init_flakey
> > +_mount_flakey
> > +
> > +# create two files that share a single block
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 4k 4k" $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 >> $seqres.full
> 
> Please use:
> 
> blksz=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite $blksz $blksz" $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 >> $seqres.full
> 
> So that this test will work properly on filesystems with bs > 4k.
> 

Yeah, I'll fix the various hardcoded sizes. Thanks.

> > +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> 
> Nit: This could be shortened to use the _cp_reflink helper, though it
> doesn't really matter to me if you do.
> 

Didn't know we had it. I'll look into it.

> > +# Perform a buffered write across the shared and non-shared blocks. On XFS, this
> > +# creates a COW fork extent that covers the shared block as well as the just
> 
> Ah, the reason why there's a cow fork extent covering the delalloc
> reservation is due to the default cow extent size hint, right?  In that
> case, you need:
> 

Yeah..

> _require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize 0" $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> 
> to ensure that the speculative cow preallocation actually gets set up.
> Otherwise, I think test won't reproduce the bug if the test config has
> -d cowextsize=1 in the mkfs options.
> 

.. but then we aren't susceptible to the problem, right?

I sometimes waffle on whether it's better for a test to create a
problematic situation and test it, or run on the configuration specified
by the user and test a particular scenario against that. Maybe the
former makes more sense in this very specific test case, but then I
suppose "cowextsize blksz*2" (or whatever large enough value) is
probably more robust than "cowextsize 0" (which I assume means "default"
and thus can change, right)?

Brian

> > +# created non-shared delalloc block. Fail the writeback to verify that all
> > +# delayed allocation is cleaned up properly.
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ERROR_WRITES
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 8k" -c fsync $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 >> $seqres.full
> 
> $((2 * blksz)), not 8k
> 
> Other than that, this looks reasonable to me.  I'll go look at the fix
> patch now. :)
> 
> --D
> 
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
> > +
> > +# Try a post-fail reflink and then unmount. Both of these are known to produce
> > +# errors and/or assert failures on XFS if we trip over a stale delalloc block.
> > +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 $SCRATCH_MNT/file3
> > +_unmount_flakey
> > +
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/651.out b/tests/generic/651.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..bd44c80c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/651.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 651
> > +fsync: Input/output error
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 16:39 [PATCH] generic: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks Brian Foster
2021-10-21 18:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-21 19:09   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-10-21 21:10     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXG6/f7tAV4+zYfy@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.