All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(): Check for `callback_result`
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:43:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXYu33uHnr5F1NOj@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211023134101.28042-1-lars@metafoo.de>

On 23-10-21, 15:41, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Before the `callback_result` callback was introduced drivers coded their
> invocation to the callback in a similar way to:
> 
> 	if (cb->callback) {
> 		spin_unlock(&dma->lock);
> 		cb->callback(cb->callback_param);
> 		spin_lock(&dma->lock);
> 	}
> 
> With the introduction of `callback_result` two helpers where introduced to
> transparently handle both types of callbacks. And drivers where updated to
> look like this:
> 
> 	if (dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(cb)) {
> 		spin_unlock(&dma->lock);
> 		dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(cb, ...);
> 		spin_lock(&dma->lock);
> 	}
> 
> dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke() correctly handles both `callback_result`
> and `callback`. But we forgot to update the dmaengine_desc_callback_valid()
> function to check for `callback_result`. As a result DMA descriptors that
> use the `callback_result` rather than `callback` don't have their callback
> invoked by drivers that follow the pattern above.
> 
> Fix this by checking for both `callback` and `callback_result` in
> dmaengine_desc_callback_valid().

Thanks for the fix, applied now

-- 
~Vinod

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-23 13:41 [PATCH] dmaengine: dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(): Check for `callback_result` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-24 18:19 ` Dave Jiang
2021-10-25  4:13 ` Vinod Koul [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXYu33uHnr5F1NOj@matsya \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.