From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFE6C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B71B60E75 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:46:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2B71B60E75 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E59B16E0; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:45:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 8E59B16E0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1635245194; bh=ttuMSMdKfO/8vL/8XwgI4pPgoy8Qb+Z1lOdVA9rTS24=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=de/uoB+XnXel2YFp/MWJ+Ij4k/UphsKzWZfQ78Loivjc+nOiZI/0N0fol9KM5ZBxp Y2dXgzHoD8QYCzNvrTRRVyoaJvUf5+1HuvNP5hms7sisQFzoarPSQP5HFFyX63d4Gu 6RGKL+n9et37hU8/tC8O8X9cEC6+86Ix1iPg7t8Y= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD85F80105; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:43:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 1C348F80105; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:43:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80991F80105 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:43:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 80991F80105 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pn1ab9W0" Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BA0660E75; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:43:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635244999; bh=ttuMSMdKfO/8vL/8XwgI4pPgoy8Qb+Z1lOdVA9rTS24=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Pn1ab9W0iOXgbFH1YO71VMO1R/W4CV97vKsUfoENZpun08l9EVPS4JikWeLpzfHAY 22uMmKer7aXSM5xyGixPD5DOJuWYAlEaLaWuL1dYWIGUv/544eY3+XLR8emZmAj0Kd ybIpazvd1urN0kUKr0Xb/diSm2fZUZfdCIwMc9EuJJMlNDO5/nn4Z4x2hFwtsmEFdQ VAd6tNHAHnyLKtYcpQIc1fUQnlkBN5XIs/WKe4Y1bmDe72fNzT8/o9FsjQ/HglqLoF 0YSfI9K2a68jpCywOyBg2OZz7k7m3c7kanuNIXoheYV68u8zXWpw9hfUPgugZLmu64 Ah2FnJJpgKy8g== Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:43:15 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Ricard Wanderlof Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: codec: tlv320adc3xxx: New codec driver Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VtVOTpwNy9opdNZ+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Times approximate. Cc: alsa-devel , Liam Girdwood X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --VtVOTpwNy9opdNZ+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 08:54:26AM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > In any design we really ought to have some explicit confirmation before > > we allow users to go randomly changing voltages, it may cause damage if > > someone gets it wrong. This means that the feature really ought to be > > an opt in one if it's going to be there. > Good point.=20 > So like a module parameter, or perhaps governed something in sysfs? I was more thinking a DT property TBH. --VtVOTpwNy9opdNZ+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmF328IACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BjAwf/VchI9msLvxF5a1H+k649r+KM5EuGg0nj0iDFLQW5Qo3VYLR+Z7CdL9sl G5zGsjGBP9+Hf9mZ5fdH2huu8WgTXBehcit6i6isk5KRhf9FTOzHGmS3tfHgtELU Utbr08jmld7NI357wlsMoY50P/EV1lZBbH1N3Ab1W/zhuPL/VCp8/pucZuYrgdmO 4ZO6IlfQBmkgGAXU7FsfbvaMMKO359liOEmJNnvNRE6TkP4Vn5LF3X2bmibMBVLw DaAiGf4yDdqx/9UoSfqzHBxl1QTvhkgVy63DkB97FIDE1RyKUzgAPBmErRI/Ng/V OlCPBrSehiMmjVcRFa8H52NnNw1p0g== =AlGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VtVOTpwNy9opdNZ+--