diff for duplicates of <YXllGfrjPX1pVUx6@google.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e714195..80cd8cb 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it, > but I have to think more about whether I agree with it. -https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com +https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com > In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only > race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 3560477..e14a5e3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,41 @@ "ref\020211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com\0" "ref\0614858dd-106c-64cc-04bc-f1887b2054d1@redhat.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" "Date\0Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:41:29 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Cc\0Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>" + Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> + Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> + Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> + Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> + Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> + Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + kvm@vger.kernel.org + kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org + kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> + Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> + " Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" @@ -11,7 +43,7 @@ "> Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it,\n" "> but I have to think more about whether I agree with it.\n" "\n" - "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com\n" + "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com\n" "\n" "> In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only\n" "> race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger\n" @@ -34,4 +66,4 @@ "double list add with VT-d posted interrupts\"). Then it would be at least plausible\n" that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. -0af9b1e4454a65b6ce4e7c63d363c27ac4746aca5d02ffed98c295422e1745df +e0a561149b361e78ceb3904df58380a011b1eeadf9d8808ecfafb0cf8ccaa86c
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index e714195..f72d2bf 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it, > but I have to think more about whether I agree with it. -https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com +https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com > In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only > race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger @@ -25,3 +25,7 @@ wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 ("KVM: VMX: avoid double list add with VT-d posted interrupts"). Then it would be at least plausible that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. +_______________________________________________ +kvmarm mailing list +kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu +https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 3560477..b05b7af 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,36 @@ "ref\020211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com\0" "ref\0614858dd-106c-64cc-04bc-f1887b2054d1@redhat.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" "Date\0Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:41:29 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Cc\0Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>" + Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> + kvm@vger.kernel.org + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> + kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> + Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org + " Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" @@ -11,7 +38,7 @@ "> Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it,\n" "> but I have to think more about whether I agree with it.\n" "\n" - "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com\n" + "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com\n" "\n" "> In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only\n" "> race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger\n" @@ -32,6 +59,10 @@ "wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the\n" "loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 (\"KVM: VMX: avoid\n" "double list add with VT-d posted interrupts\"). Then it would be at least plausible\n" - that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. + "that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in.\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "kvmarm mailing list\n" + "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu\n" + https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm -0af9b1e4454a65b6ce4e7c63d363c27ac4746aca5d02ffed98c295422e1745df +2f664567c90b89c44272b727d40fe37cf52ea7efb451f0c403f0530ab2fac0e1
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index e714195..710e9f7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it, > but I have to think more about whether I agree with it. -https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com +https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com > In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only > race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger @@ -25,3 +25,8 @@ wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 ("KVM: VMX: avoid double list add with VT-d posted interrupts"). Then it would be at least plausible that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-riscv mailing list +linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 3560477..6dd1ed3 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,41 @@ "ref\020211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com\0" "ref\0614858dd-106c-64cc-04bc-f1887b2054d1@redhat.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" "Date\0Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:41:29 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Cc\0Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>" + Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> + Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> + Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> + Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> + Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> + Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + kvm@vger.kernel.org + kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org + kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> + Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> + " Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" @@ -11,7 +43,7 @@ "> Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it,\n" "> but I have to think more about whether I agree with it.\n" "\n" - "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com\n" + "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com\n" "\n" "> In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only\n" "> race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger\n" @@ -32,6 +64,11 @@ "wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the\n" "loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 (\"KVM: VMX: avoid\n" "double list add with VT-d posted interrupts\"). Then it would be at least plausible\n" - that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. + "that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-riscv mailing list\n" + "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv -0af9b1e4454a65b6ce4e7c63d363c27ac4746aca5d02ffed98c295422e1745df +5dcc89c165c5a95183b92e1fe90f53691dc4e83df463e58bcc65a5bee17fc9c6
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N4/1.txt index e714195..6f17b1a 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N4/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it, > but I have to think more about whether I agree with it. -https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com +https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com > In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only > race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger @@ -25,3 +25,8 @@ wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 ("KVM: VMX: avoid double list add with VT-d posted interrupts"). Then it would be at least plausible that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N4/content_digest index 3560477..5a36074 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N4/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,41 @@ "ref\020211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com\0" "ref\0614858dd-106c-64cc-04bc-f1887b2054d1@redhat.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 00/43] KVM: Halt-polling and x86 APICv overhaul\0" "Date\0Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:41:29 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Cc\0Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>" + Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> + Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> + Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> + Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> + Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> + Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + kvm@vger.kernel.org + kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org + kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> + Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> + " Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" @@ -11,7 +43,7 @@ "> Queued 1-20 and 22-28. Initially I skipped 21 because I didn't receive it,\n" "> but I have to think more about whether I agree with it.\n" "\n" - "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc at google.com\n" + "https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211009021236.4122790-22-seanjc@google.com\n" "\n" "> In reality the CMPXCHG loops can really fail just once, because they only\n" "> race with the processor setting ON=1. But if the warnings were to trigger\n" @@ -32,6 +64,11 @@ "wrong and confusing (for me). The WARNs in the loops made more sense when the\n" "loops ran with IRQs enabled prior to commit 8b306e2f3c41 (\"KVM: VMX: avoid\n" "double list add with VT-d posted interrupts\"). Then it would be at least plausible\n" - that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in. + "that a vCPU could mess up its own descriptor while being scheduled out/in.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -0af9b1e4454a65b6ce4e7c63d363c27ac4746aca5d02ffed98c295422e1745df +7ce1da47b01b00735bea57d3cced172c79e7390999074c08dacf334f9512fd31
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.