From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Question] ext4/xfs: Default behavior changed after per-file DAX
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:01:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXqfLDLogZlk3m9e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <665787d0-f227-a95b-37a3-20f2ea3e09aa@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:52:27PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/21 10:36 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >>
> >> Is the biggest issue the lack of visibility to see if the device supports DAX?
> >
> > Not necessarily. I think for me two biggest issues are.
> >
> > - Should dax be enabled by default in server as well. If we do that,
> > server will have to make extra ioctl() call on every LOOKUP and GETATTR
> > fuse request. Local filesystems probably can easily query FS_XFLAGS_DAX
> > state but doing extra syscall all the time will probably be some cost
> > (No idea how much).
>
> I tested the time cost from virtiofsd's perspective (time cost of
> passthrough_ll.c:lo_do_lookup()):
> - before per inode DAX feature: 2~4 us
> - after per inode DAX feature: 7~8 us
>
> It is within expectation, as the introduction of per inode DAX feature,
> one extra ioctl() system call is introduced.
>
> Also the time cost from client's perspective (time cost of
> fs/fuse/dir.c:fuse_lookup_name())
> - before per inode DAX feature: 25~30 us
> - after per inode DAX feature: 30~35 us
>
> That is, ~15%~20% performance loss.
Hi Jeffle,
Thanks for measuring the performance impact of enabling dax=inode by
default in server.
>
> Currently we do ioctl() to query the persitent inode flags every time
> FUSE_LOOKUP request is received, maybe we could cache the result of
> ioctl() on virtiofsd side, but I have no idea how to intercept the
> runtime modification to these persistent indoe flags from other
> processes on host, e.g. sysadmin on host, to maintain the cache consistency.
>
> So if the default behavior of client side is 'dax=inode', and virtiofsd
> disables per inode DAX by default (neither '-o dax=server|attr' is
> specified for virtiofsd) for the sake of performance, then guest won't
> see DAX enabled and thus won't be surprised. This can reduce the
> behavior change to the minimum.
Agreed. Lets not enable any dax by default in server and let admin/user
enable dax explicitly in server. From fuse client perspective, we can
assume dax=inode by default. That way kernel side behavior will be
similar to ext4/xfs (as long as server has been started with per
inode dax policy).
Vivek
>
>
> >
> > - So far if virtiofs is mounted without any of the dax options, just
> > by looking at mount option, I could tell, DAX is not enabled on any
> > of the files. But that will not be true anymore. Because dax=inode
> > be default, it is possible that server upgrade enabled dax on some
> > or all the files.
> >
> > I guess I will have to stick to same reason given by ext4/xfs. That is
> > to determine whether DAX is enabled on a file or not, you need to
> > query STATX_ATTR_DAX flag. That's the only way to conclude if DAX is
> > being used on a file or not. Don't look at filesystem mount options
> > and reach a conclusion (except the case of dax=never).
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Jeffle
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 14:12 [Question] ext4/xfs: Default behavior changed after per-file DAX JeffleXu
2021-10-26 15:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-26 19:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-10-26 20:57 ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-27 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-10-28 5:52 ` JeffleXu
2021-10-28 13:01 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-10-28 18:24 ` Ira Weiny
2021-10-28 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-10-26 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2021-10-27 13:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-10-28 16:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-10-28 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-27 2:52 ` JeffleXu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXqfLDLogZlk3m9e@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.