From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A60DC433EF for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5363261184 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:07:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5363261184 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HgsQ6045zz2ywR for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 06:07:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=WxehgYFY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=i5bUvTKm; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=64.147.123.24; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=WxehgYFY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=i5bUvTKm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgsPJ2LSxz2xCW for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 06:07:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693BF3201D2E; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:07:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=LV4SKcw+eGyrFwZPeyGo8uVehh0 W4MDbO0ItkQZNemc=; b=WxehgYFYWXpi+UbOZAawfoOH8NoLftPhENIlMEw7afe 0k5/LzRpw+URyQtXhgOdFNfHopFtivFOeajr5HeMMC7DOadLdlvdPjN7snS7nnDT 7UAVylIYBxOkVmZfM6r/eEhKtuDe/AUUWKjm+JAoAjoD2NTTAEGdJZw0wdREKhz7 ldeuOTxBdGH8EpCFaWvQbFVQRXu9RXoXtDxQXQ5TOXCM1Se5ESZYDcxofp871s27 DX/FRgpSGO1EvcQPlLKobUpln7PukEH6LQ1bZRKvoRzqJHWDkbRh2sNxdWafjsz4 0To+EcVG2FdftEkaWtUSSDlVe2j0G55/odYxLcH3Kug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LV4SKc w+eGyrFwZPeyGo8uVehh0W4MDbO0ItkQZNemc=; b=i5bUvTKm7z1tGL3Fmy9dkI k5kOzyg72M9bqnT8uXMxI3zizyOMyYVnDt/QMKe4JhmIjk/Mt0mUX3Khii98PLT4 NwAAQCQ0wJqLcjNqE47/5uNqN4gwc3xzLGrGcUanN6J9BRqZd7T9/PhEZ7vptSkq HMkOvnigcdbZh76df2Q1mzySzGqqC6Ug7GITM8+BmIEBqQtTdmA0Ns3zb3tc09Gg C4WL62boE7k2bxmX32xiAfOvicxk5slefr4UNSkYtBjI+vFKc0ldPfs1LN/LBPZl es9jNPA9RiYrJJzeaa8YihUHdW1Z0DFHoBcnwTV8MHiS+Kaj1NDzErhDnlLfmm+A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdeghedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enfghrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredt tddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghkse hsthiftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfdu hfegfefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprghtrhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:07:12 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Brad Bishop Subject: Re: OTP-5: "OpenBMC TOF Proposal" Process Message-ID: References: <20211029163720.ztct456rqf7tmezj@cheese> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3hqv7m0aSmmWreAA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211029163720.ztct456rqf7tmezj@cheese> X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC List Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --3hqv7m0aSmmWreAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:37:20PM -0400, Brad Bishop wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:33:51PM -0500, Patrick Williams wrote: >=20 > >## Definitions > > > >* OTP: An "OpenBMC TOF Proposal". Any request to the TOF should be fram= ed as > > an OTP as documented by this process. > > > >* Author: The individual(s) who write the initial draft of the OTP. > > > >* Champion: A member of the TOF, confirmed by the current TOF chair, who= will >=20 > What does confirmed mean here? The chair will document the champion=20 > somewhere? Also what if nobody on the TOF wants to volunteer to=20 > champion the proposal? One will be appointed and try their hardest to=20 > represent the interests of the person making the proposal? This might need to be worded differently. I anticipated a few scenarios: 1. Multiple individuals are all so excited about a proposal that they w= ant to volunteer to be the champion. 2. Only one individual is excited enough to volunteer to be a champion. 3. No one is excited enough to volunteer. In #2, the "confirmation" is easy. In #1, the chair should pick one of the= m. In #3, the chair should pick someone, yes, and as you said: try their harde= st to represent the interests of the person making the proposal. I recollect we'= ve=20 discussed that others would be invited to the TOF discussions for their own proposals, but I don't see where that is documented. If that is so, acting= as champion shouldn't even require buy-in to the proposal itself and means mor= e of coordinating the after-effects of the decision(s). >=20 > > work with the Author while this process is being followed to ensure th= at > > appropriate updates to the OTP are being made. If the Author is a mem= ber of > > the TOF it is expected that they will also act as Champion to their ow= n OTP. --=20 Patrick Williams --3hqv7m0aSmmWreAA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmF8Rl4ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRluaxAAgqDkYt2aSVKDrYg+5A40zQymI5p9PO+Gezw/CquZEpCOOJkejVQc6iNF UPP0sHxCQVQh2AjJc3uJi6X3n2hvo2nzMCmKVctse6+hFKdEA5UUOYHih2s7r6BN GCLzNnkVGVQKXGIFQZ2ZlsQnP5h/2hvE7wiythXRcZUWnDgIFytiudvVsRN5ZGpg GjXlUwxk8CgG6BjCPWU8EF0cGPIAcyJ1UlGWLNdlVKyGc4Bwmhw1jns7a8LFtdXN 6bsAIJSFqsZSXm0xqGBsq/X0GtTfYMYMRrsB7gIs4hI89RuCqQ00A5xQv/7NwPtT Wz/gAbYzUXGMUpsIO16JsEuoyJM2YcPRPhoAQyhkQSnHiaqlZ/N2JAD+Zcsof4wV LmY4FuAp+ebh9WTrkrjuFq+8G7uo7k0c/puCff1NR4hh5B6703zvT+h709I3ty90 flo/CAnTQkeuNuIn37rsg5ShXX/d8qtUMH/loxb+UF9HDKgitiY9rGDIWk3iPbdz /w5pNF/9BKTuM8heDLWftmmDSPNefaMLQU0gAFAP/A2nx6GbfYFtfy+nu7vfdu1l gpOrrr5h3a/6CfBlvOHVJSbq8TyGNRHdH2le/cIsARp9rgOKx3XcF8U8LlVxVZQI ptkbW3TVd40Q2ODywVgLimam3zIaG2zg9aWxBFbedPylGDsahXI= =m1nt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3hqv7m0aSmmWreAA--