From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Leyi Rong <leyi.rong@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: buildtools/binutils-avx512-check.sh
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:43:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY5vcWysOnqrDvFS@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211112160837.131994aa@sovereign>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 04:08:37PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on improvement of Linux-to-Windows cross-compilation using MinGW.
> Currently there is c_args = '-mno-avx512f' in config/x86/cross-mingw, however,
> 1) baseline meson 0.49.2 doesn't like it*
> 2) it should be in machine_args because they are checked in various places
> 3) I don't like disabling AVX512F if there is really no issue**
> So I started looking at the subject script.
>
> * '-mno-avx512f' should be ['-mno-avx512f'], but then the build of lib/net
> breaks, because meson 0.49.2 and 0.57.0 (native Windows baseline)
> order compiler arguments differently.
>
> ** There was a .seh_savemm bug with MinGW that -mno-avx512f was trying to fix,
> but I believe that -fno-asynchronous-unwind tables was the final solution.
> However, AVX512 support is still broken for native MinGW builds, see below.
>
> First question. In config/x86/meson.build we have:
>
> # get binutils version for the workaround of Bug 97
> if not is_windows
> binutils_ok = run_command(binutils_avx512_check)
> if binutils_ok.returncode() != 0 and cc.has_argument('-mno-avx512f')
> machine_args += '-mno-avx512f'
> warning('Binutils error with AVX512 assembly, disabling AVX512
> support')
> endif
> endif
>
> This is a GNU binutils bug and if I understand correctly,
> it doesn't affect builds that use LLVM binutils (FreeBSD and Windows+clang).
> The script also uses ${AS:-as} and objdump, that may be missing.
> Consequently, AVX512F may be disabled for LLVM-based builds
> because GNU toolchain has a bug or is just absent:
>
> root@freebsd:/tmp/dpdk # meson build
> [...]
> config/x86/meson.build:9: WARNING: Binutils error with AVX512 assembly,
> disabling AVX512 support
> [...]
>
> root@freebsd:/tmp/dpdk # uname -r
> 13.0-RELEASE
>
> root@freebsd:/tmp/dpdk # ./buildtools/binutils-avx512-check.sh
> ./buildtools/binutils-avx512-check.sh: as: not found
> ./buildtools/binutils-avx512-check.sh: objdump: not found
> vpgatherqq displacement error with as
>
> Probably the script output and its check should be enhanced
> to distinguish between its failure and success with negative answer?
> Or should the check be done under a condition like this?
>
> if not is_windows and (is_linux or cc.get_id() == 'gcc')
>
That seems reasonable. At least in this case, the failure mode is fairly
safe as it always gives a correct build, but if it can be improved I have
no objection.
>
> The next question is the preferred approach to fix things for Windows.
> Current status:
> 1) MinGW 8.1.0 on Windows: buggy
> 2) MinGW 7.0.0 on Linux: OK
> 3) LLVM on Windows: OK
>
> One solution is simply state this:
>
> if not is_windows
> binutils_bug_97 = ... # run the script
> elif cc.get_id() == 'gcc'
> binutils_bug_97 = true
The script still needs to be run here. Even in case of gcc, it's only a few
point releases of binutils that cause issues.
> endif
> if binutils_bug_97
> machine_args += '-mno-avx512f'
> warning('...')
> endif
>
> Another one is to make the script portable
> and run it when LLVM is not used, on any OS, including cross builds.
> By the way, $AS and objdump binaries may be overridden in a --cross-file,
> so in this case we should locate them with meson.
Seems reasonable, and easy enough to fix.
> What to others think?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-12 13:08 buildtools/binutils-avx512-check.sh Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-11-12 13:43 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YY5vcWysOnqrDvFS@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.