All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: make sure that request queue queiesce and unquiesce balanced
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:18:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYnooJNLvHIQA0Xk@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYnEVuwp/jMngPYo@T590>

Hello James,

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:44:06AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello James,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 11:42:01AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 11:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +void scsi_start_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (cmpxchg(&sdev->queue_stopped, 1, 0))
> > > +		blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void scsi_stop_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, bool nowait)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (!cmpxchg(&sdev->queue_stopped, 0, 1)) {
> > > +		if (nowait)
> > > +			blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(sdev-
> > > >request_queue);
> > > +		else
> > > +			blk_mq_quiesce_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		if (!nowait)
> > > +			blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done(sdev->request_queue);
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > 
> > This looks counter intuitive.  I assume it's done so that if we call
> > scsi_stop_queue when the queue has already been stopped, it waits until
> 
> The motivation is to balance blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait()/blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
> and blk_mq_unquiesce_queue().
> 
> That needs one extra mutex to cover the quiesce action and update
> the flag, but we can't hold the mutex in scsi_internal_device_block_nowait(),
> so take this way with the atomic flag.
> 
> > the queue is actually quiesced before returning so the behaviour is the
> > same in the !nowait case?  Some sort of comment explaining that would
> > be useful.
> 
> I will add comment on the current usage.

Are you fine with the following comment?

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index e8925a35cb3a..9e3bf028f95a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -2661,6 +2661,13 @@ void scsi_start_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 
 static void scsi_stop_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, bool nowait)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The atomic variable of ->queue_stopped covers that
+	 * blk_mq_quiesce_queue* is balanced with blk_mq_unquiesce_queue.
+	 *
+	 * However, we still need to wait until quiesce is done
+	 * in case that queue has been stopped.
+	 */
 	if (!cmpxchg(&sdev->queue_stopped, 0, 1)) {
 		if (nowait)
 			blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(sdev->request_queue);


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-03  3:43 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix concurrent quiesce Ming Lei
2021-11-03  3:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: add one API for waiting until quiesce is done Ming Lei
2021-11-03  3:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: avoid to quiesce sdev->request_queue two times Ming Lei
2021-11-03  3:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: make sure that request queue queiesce and unquiesce balanced Ming Lei
2021-11-08 16:42   ` James Bottomley
2021-11-09  0:44     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-09  3:18       ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-11-09  3:22         ` James Bottomley
2021-11-03  3:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: wait until quiesce is done Ming Lei
2021-11-08 16:45   ` Keith Busch
2021-11-12 15:38   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-07 21:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] block: fix concurrent quiesce Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYnooJNLvHIQA0Xk@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.