From: Matthew Bobrowski via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/fanotify21: add new test checking the returned pidfd from fanotify in FAN_REPORT_PIDFD mode
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:36:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYpBAlufyR0nlI7S@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxgphXO16-u2fsm9Ts4nxY3AzSPpyMbKMWb2AtWs2ASB7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 06:21:56AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > +next_event:
> > + i += event->event_len;
> > + if (event->fd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(event->fd);
> > +
> > + if (info && info->pidfd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(info->pidfd);
> > +
> > + if (event_pidfd_fdinfo)
> > + free(event_pidfd_fdinfo);
>
> Need to reset event_pidfd_fdinfo = NULL
> to avoid double free in do_cleanup
But, the variable event_pidfd_fdinfo is not referenced nor is visible
outside the scope of the do_test() function and therefore no double
free would occur, right?
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void do_cleanup(void)
> > +{
> > + if (fanotify_fd >= 0)
> > + SAFE_CLOSE(fanotify_fd);
> > +
> > + if (self_pidfd_fdinfo)
> > + free(self_pidfd_fdinfo);
Variables self_pidfd_fdinfo do_cleanup() and event_pidfd_fdinfo
do_test() are different.
/M
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 10:57 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] Test support for new fanotify FAN_REPORT_PIDFD feature Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 10:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls/fanotify20: add new test for FAN_REPORT_PIDFD Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 11:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-02 11:15 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 12:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-05 3:03 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-02 10:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/fanotify21: add new test checking the returned pidfd from fanotify in FAN_REPORT_PIDFD mode Matthew Bobrowski via ltp
2021-11-05 4:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-09 9:36 ` Matthew Bobrowski via ltp [this message]
2021-11-09 10:34 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYpBAlufyR0nlI7S@google.com \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=repnop@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.