From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:39:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211123161813.326307-2-axboe@kernel.dk>
> + /* create task io_context, if we don't have one already */
> + if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
> + create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, rq->q->node);
Wouldn't it be nicer to have an interface that hides the check
and the somewhat pointless current argument? And name that with a
blk_ prefix?
> +
> + blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc(rq);
But thinking about this a little more:
struct io_context has two uses, one is the unsigned short ioprio,
and the other is the whole bfq mess.
Can't we just split the ioprio out (we'll find a hole somewhere
in task_struct) and then just allocate the io_context in
blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc, which would also avoid the pointless
ioc_lookup_icq on a newly allocated io_context. I'd also really
expect blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc to be implemented in blk-ioc.c.
While we're at it: bfq_bic_lookup is a really weird helper which
gets passed an unused bfqd argument.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 16:18 [PATCHSET 0/3] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-11-23 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-ioprio: don't set bio priority if not needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: only allocate poll_stats if there's a user of them Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-11-23 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:06 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-23 17:10 [PATCHSET 0/3 v2] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.