From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Jing Liu <jing2.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"Cooper, Andrew" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:12:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZQQuQDWPhcJG6pM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee7g53rp.ffs@tglx>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Now you could argue that the interrupt/softirq XSAVES should also read
> the XFD MSR and save it in guest_fpstate.xfd. Same in schedule()
> and kvm_put_guest_fpu(), i.e:
>
> XSAVES
> if (fpstate->is_guest) {
> rdmsrl(XFD, xfd);
> fpstate->xfd = xfd;
> __this_cpu_write(..., xfd);
> }
>
> We can do that, but I'm unhappy about this conditional in schedule(). So
> I was asking for doing a simple KVM only solution first:
Ah, the schedule() conditional is the part I was missing. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 13:01 Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel Liu, Jing2
2021-11-16 12:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-16 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 19:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-16 20:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-16 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 22:11 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-17 7:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-16 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-11-16 23:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-16 19:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-17 4:52 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-17 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-17 10:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-17 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-17 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 23:17 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-11-19 10:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-19 15:41 ` Nakajima, Jun
2021-12-08 0:50 ` Rewording of Setting IA32_XFD[18] (Re: Thoughts of AMX KVM support based on latest kernel) Nakajima, Jun
2021-12-08 13:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZQQuQDWPhcJG6pM@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.