From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E991C433EF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237680AbhKWOY0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:24:26 -0500 Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.229]:45077 "EHLO new3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237584AbhKWOYZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:24:25 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B9758172E; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:21:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:21:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=c9ZKjgRNScFEEV/g9e1Z5f3zy02 1dtFpLJDQhZd1/RI=; b=LJVkSW+RRuqcE1axk0M62cALHgc+BN1Qo36C0IShkoh esTHbciFRQFyBtAibYdiyQBCEvrl34OTFmJ/1c6QQVXvtOg2mqSRPI9b8rrojSpw 7ZxzjDyQTSP24CV/fL19zwYvkYfr12onn+t757SpnDN0z/8SNR2UfteVg4ymB31R qLE5Q4iyfySmi5UBAyuLdyJFZ6ZS6ZvxnYK6E4vbu/4eFaXidTcOOkPNjIevspEX Gw50XL/GCInCk/5Di93kdiVooYxP0XDhC4kdrIT+BdFlsvV23+IqLYgumlXjLOlg 3oTr5d3hvQfxkc9V4NrCsEAX+YIjkTCLfH0+6zNWgGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=c9ZKjg RNScFEEV/g9e1Z5f3zy021dtFpLJDQhZd1/RI=; b=L72/KiQAh81f5WDpW2Oab0 J5b1VC9wrCu5DnbjQL6BkcVP6CvEpekQ9lBLvv19VikXtGExUQyKUTEdWBzmB6W8 5k5ajCDIKYED3dUcFcAXNKP0tW8RcCMGr3lQdrPHnOw1HmwqLxfOjTfpe2khVO9k sWdEv11HjyFId2LTr0DqJMTZvjQpwTE4qvKT2wA2vHRrsYwhR+8Qwh7Mk0rDzxrz QOp8sx91Llf/zqSGCkKZfWPHq2ISDWIYWkSCpBn+X4v6QRzzqAUUKsKphUquu1ZE 5theDyqEfBMgJNVLnG3OYTosz7Wx1Os/P0jDSw2efQRIMO7wDCSkbPc0TSY9F4Kw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrgeeigdeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfm jfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueelledthe ekleethfeludduvdfhffeuvdffudevgeehkeegieffveehgeeftefgnecuffhomhgrihhn pehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:21:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:21:14 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Stephan Gerhold Cc: Sasha Levin , stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add CPU ACC and SAW/SPM" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree Message-ID: References: <20211121230414.76410-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > Hi Sasha, > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 06:04:14PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add CPU ACC and SAW/SPM > > > > to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > arm64-dts-qcom-msm8916-add-cpu-acc-and-saw-spm.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let know about it. > > > > Did you forget to drop this patch? :) > > You mentioned that you did [1] (since I replied that this patch is not > useful without other changes in 5.16), but apparently not. ;) I've deleted it now from 5.15 and 5.10 queues. thanks, greg k-h