From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] devlink: Simplify devlink resources unregister call
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:00:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaXaHCW3/WQiiTeS@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129201400.488c8ef9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:14:00PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:42:44 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > The devlink_resources_unregister() used second parameter as an
> > entry point for the recursive removal of devlink resources. None
> > of external to devlink users needed to use this field, so lat's
>
> None of the callers outside of devlink core...
> s/lat/let/
>
> > remove it.
>
> > diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> > index e3c88fabd700..043fcec8b0aa 100644
> > --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> > +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> > @@ -361,33 +361,6 @@ devlink_resource_size_params_init(struct devlink_resource_size_params *size_para
> >
> > typedef u64 devlink_resource_occ_get_t(void *priv);
> >
> > -/**
> > - * struct devlink_resource - devlink resource
> > - * @name: name of the resource
> > - * @id: id, per devlink instance
> > - * @size: size of the resource
> > - * @size_new: updated size of the resource, reload is needed
> > - * @size_valid: valid in case the total size of the resource is valid
> > - * including its children
> > - * @parent: parent resource
> > - * @size_params: size parameters
> > - * @list: parent list
> > - * @resource_list: list of child resources
> > - */
> > -struct devlink_resource {
> > - const char *name;
> > - u64 id;
> > - u64 size;
> > - u64 size_new;
> > - bool size_valid;
> > - struct devlink_resource *parent;
> > - struct devlink_resource_size_params size_params;
> > - struct list_head list;
> > - struct list_head resource_list;
> > - devlink_resource_occ_get_t *occ_get;
> > - void *occ_get_priv;
> > -};
>
> > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> > index fd21022145a3..db3b52110cf2 100644
> > --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,35 @@ struct devlink {
> > char priv[] __aligned(NETDEV_ALIGN);
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct devlink_resource - devlink resource
> > + * @name: name of the resource
> > + * @id: id, per devlink instance
> > + * @size: size of the resource
> > + * @size_new: updated size of the resource, reload is needed
> > + * @size_valid: valid in case the total size of the resource is valid
> > + * including its children
> > + * @parent: parent resource
> > + * @size_params: size parameters
> > + * @list: parent list
> > + * @resource_list: list of child resources
> > + * @occ_get: occupancy getter callback
> > + * @occ_get_priv: occupancy getter callback priv
> > + */
> > +struct devlink_resource {
> > + const char *name;
> > + u64 id;
> > + u64 size;
> > + u64 size_new;
> > + bool size_valid;
> > + struct devlink_resource *parent;
> > + struct devlink_resource_size_params size_params;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + struct list_head resource_list;
> > + devlink_resource_occ_get_t *occ_get;
> > + void *occ_get_priv;
> > +};
>
> Hiding struct devlink_resource is not mentioned in the commit message
> and entirely unrelated to removal of the unused argument.
devlink_resources_unregister() was the API function that is declared in
the devlink.h that used "struct devlink_resource". Once we removed extra
parameter from that function, the "struct devlink_resource" left as not
used at all. So this "hiding" is related and part of this simplification
patch.
I will add it to the commit message.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-28 12:42 [PATCH net-next v1] devlink: Simplify devlink resources unregister call Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-30 4:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-30 8:00 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-11-30 15:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YaXaHCW3/WQiiTeS@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.