From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] s390x: KVM: accept STSI for CPU topology information
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:54:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbImqX/NEus71tZ1@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211209133616.650491fd@p-imbrenda>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 01:36:16PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:14:43 +0100
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > We let the userland hypervisor know if the machine support the CPU
> > topology facility using a new KVM capability: KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY.
> >
> > The PTF instruction will report a topology change if there is any change
> > with a previous STSI_15_1_2 SYSIB.
> > Changes inside a STSI_15_1_2 SYSIB occur if CPU bits are set or clear
> > inside the CPU Topology List Entry CPU mask field, which happens with
> > changes in CPU polarization, dedication, CPU types and adding or
> > removing CPUs in a socket.
> >
> > The reporting to the guest is done using the Multiprocessor
> > Topology-Change-Report (MTCR) bit of the utility entry of the guest's
> > SCA which will be cleared during the interpretation of PTF.
> >
> > To check if the topology has been modified we use a new field of the
> > arch vCPU to save the previous real CPU ID at the end of a schedule
> > and verify on next schedule that the CPU used is in the same socket.
> >
> > We assume in this patch:
> > - no polarization change: only horizontal polarization is currently
> > used in linux.
Why is this assumption necessary? The statement that Linux runs only
with horizontal polarization is not true.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 13:14 [PATCH v5 0/1] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2021-11-22 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] s390x: KVM: accept STSI for CPU topology information Pierre Morel
2021-12-07 9:43 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-09 12:36 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-12-09 13:31 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-09 15:54 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2021-12-13 10:05 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-13 14:26 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-13 15:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-12-13 15:46 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-09 16:08 ` Janosch Frank
2021-12-13 10:16 ` Pierre Morel
2021-12-14 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Alexandra Winter
2021-12-16 15:16 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbImqX/NEus71tZ1@osiris \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.