From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E8E1C433F5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181743C8EA3 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33883C092C for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:54:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAAA91400C63 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:54:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE25212C4; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1639562060; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F+OrsxxkronFRjD+FWx2bwZZ8H38f+Llt16ebgdtnyE=; b=cO0s/Rbg7xn55TnhYMpmTYNGP2K8Vv5YhtlM1PZsj0XUhzZ7EqnKSJR6+cgrbpLiO+mFUr bJh8PWRestPH+AryR4vZZDAVY/Pu8mJclslexEJC/wszpPwv+mmATPG0Z0xGAZkyuNPpqE axifYBBXhxXfr3oYN403eYuTEkUYaH0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1639562060; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F+OrsxxkronFRjD+FWx2bwZZ8H38f+Llt16ebgdtnyE=; b=4KtG8GuEYqKb7fmQpVezKEm3UK5J3tkxjmASxyRRSzyviamK0VyIW3VC/Oai7kQyvaVDYa jpp0gik4kAaS/FBQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF1313B09; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id VQBsLEy7uWFoXwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:54:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:54:18 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20211214144309.6704-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20211214144309.6704-4-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] lib: Add support for debugging .all_filesystems X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi Petr, Cyril > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 5:29 PM Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > > > Hmm, I think it also makes sense to people who care about the > > > only one filesystem on their product. So this should _NOT_ be limit > > > for test/debug, because it can help to reduce testing time for specific > > > requirements. > > With that line of reasoning it should be just called LTP_FS_TYPES and > > user should be able to specify a list... > Okay right, so just let it is, if there is new requirement we can add that. OK, I'll merge it as is. Thanks a lot both! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp