From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3FC433EF for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230341AbhLOGYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:24:35 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:51446 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229622AbhLOGYf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:24:35 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D65212BC; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:24:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1639549473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s+UsgwAj/Es2kpywdgbIRaddQM/4YOShamve6J8QLgo=; b=MfSc+rPJUaSaYwl2OL75O+BrLjXhcekyW6hFlFlJ1yr9/13cYG0r8xWC1qcCcYV860w/+y fthnDgXLlWpvBvfeokaWOR+y6frRROxqSyUDQcVpXQ6YVaCy5t32sOgUFMR9wrInn+r4rU wu0sXd9sDxSH6cKjRtlkujgge+/ADp0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1639549473; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s+UsgwAj/Es2kpywdgbIRaddQM/4YOShamve6J8QLgo=; b=3hbDzRUZcLwEsBscRrmXrVZuT41kcSafMRWFfikMkkKvSbFXNrH8FeCDwQzzLK6inDbRpE YCAQ32vROoTIZQDw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808E813A6B; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 1kO4HSGKuWFXCAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:24:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 07:24:31 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich , Neil Horman Subject: Re: Support sha256 as default (SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_SHA256) Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcelo, > Hi, > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:16:08PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi all, > > what is the reason there is no support for sha256 as default > > (SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_SHA256)? sha256 is mentioned in RFC 4895 (2007). > I'm not aware of any particular reason. Perhaps it just wasn't > implemented. We're open to patches, btw. ;-) Thanks for info, I'll have a look into it. Kind regards, Petr > Marcelo