From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2735F168 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 06:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077F032009E0; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:32:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:33:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=i+Xa9JQgZRKXXLOI7u0IfbVXZau M1zpZgey1fhPKaUw=; b=aXQ0fiRk0cAU2wPP2XySb2Ou9fqATcovxtQlH1/gcfZ k4ZK1HSzv2CdelkzMwaSJml39PHtVf5orU3cdAdoGU/snn0oxiO1GP/1y+Ch6HCP vFFlfjd7HW4906SMUjOCrgWqscFKGJC3r3HUkyTNvAUkiKYwOSefMXqjZNj2fLzL kvT/W3YsNsNWwHi1ymYkCmcaYm91KVOFzJ+wjt1sQ2TSNBu+/VATJvZ9La297r1i YSYTyoizVHIUo92x/vscjE7FuLrtJvysFIRxanGMt55c6UdEWlC0VsRjj9KHnMyN cczevbbXtoZql+ruuy31J2vPm4jJtCfSkl4UU8VNaLw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=i+Xa9J QgZRKXXLOI7u0IfbVXZauM1zpZgey1fhPKaUw=; b=NnE3acgg+SDDmWlUkwE4l8 VSFfJgejeCsI9i5SA9D3DoKHY2rg24fVwfehAjOPpm9uKPz2yO/F1MZyVepYLH9y 7QpYUnf5R3GTccRiKydKtTtolrUzbxUSWAjXwhKE97qiqIhkamMSxk10sIC6T26i Lsm1gmsGQ1+mFeIhuVNmctY7gRny1glOYiXQN2K+nDMUYvMAeYLUNPzfvSFkJTH1 H5UOlBwf6c72HvrWyNIb2bFTrR3UiTbqBTZ6aPzwHKuJTtVJUJY8Om1iQ+8GQSlj Go7aC21orYpHmFuM+JDQk+f85CynFNCAaCkOOzaJNoalkFrnIF/P1/WR0OP9HQZw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddthedgleekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfmjfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheq necuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueelledtheekleethfeludduvdfhffeuvdffudevgeehke egieffveehgeeftefgnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhh drtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 01:32:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:32:54 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" Subject: Re: [Bug 215117] New: ucsi_acpi: kernel NULL pointer dereference #forregzbot Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. > > For the record: > > #regzbot fixed-by: 3f345e907a8e7c56fdebf7231cd67afc85d02aaa > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-linus&id=3f345e907a8e7c56fdebf7231cd67afc85d02aaa > > Greg helpfully added a "Link:" tag to make regzbot happy, but he > specified a reply to the report and not the report itself, as expected > by regzbot (I'm taken back and forth for a while already if that's a > good or bad idea). And that was not Greg's but my fault, as I had given > him the wrong link here: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/YcH2w9jmGnqUMWp4@kroah.com/ Sorry about that, I tried! :( Keep up the great work, we'll get the workflow down yet. greg k-h