All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pinctrl: baytrail: Clear direct_irq_en flag on broken configs
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:29:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd/i54iSdRGv1peX@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220112210200.265429-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:02:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some boards set the direct_irq_en flag in the conf0 register without
> setting the correct trigger bits. The direct_irq_en flag just means that
> the GPIO will send IRQs directly to the APIC instead of going through
> the shared interrupt for the GPIO controller, in order for the pin to be
> able to actually generate IRQs the trigger flags must configure the IRQ
> as a level-high or level-low active IRQ.
> 
> Note testing shows that using edge trigger add the conf0 register level
> does NOT work, instead edge triggering should be set at the IO-APIC level.
> 
> I believe that the direct_irq_en flag connects the output of the GPIO's IRQ
> trigger block, which normally sets the status flag in the IRQ status reg at
> 0x800 to one of the IO-APIC pins according to the direct IRQ mux.
> 
> This means that the TRIG_LVL bit *must* be set, so that the GPIO's input
> value is directly passed (1:1 or inverted) to the IO-APIC pin, if TRIG_LVL
> is not set, selecting edge mode operation then on the first edge the
> selected IO-APIC pin goes high, but since no write-to-clear write will be
> done to the IRQ status reg at 0x800, the detected edge condition will never
> get cleared.
> 
> This APIC pin stuck high condition can be observed with the pin configured
> as level-high active, in the form of an interrupt storm. Clearing the
> TRIG_MASK bits of conf0 stops the storm, reconfiguring them as edge again
> results in a storm again as soon as the edge is triggered once.
> 
> Detect invalid trigger flags, log a FW_BUG warning when encountering this
> and clear the direct_irq_en flag so that a driver can actually use the pin
> as IRQ through gpiod_to_irq().
> 
> Specifically this allows the edt-ft5x06 touchscreen driver to use
> INT33FC:02 pin 3 as touchscreen IRQ on the Nextbook Ares 8 tablet,
> accompanied by the following new log message
> 
> byt_gpio INT33FC:02: [Firmware Bug]: pin 3: direct_irq_en set without trigger, clearing
> 
> The new byt_direct_irq_sanity_check() function also checks that the
> pin is actually appointed to one of the 16 direct-IRQs which the GPIO
> controller supports and on success prints debug messages like these:
> 
> byt_gpio INT33FC:02: Pin 0: uses direct IRQ 0 (IO-APIC 67)
> byt_gpio INT33FC:02: Pin 15: uses direct IRQ 2 (IO-APIC 69)
> 
> This is useful to figure out the GPIO pin belonging to ACPI
> resources like this one: "Interrupt () { 0x00000043 }" or
> the other way around.
> 
> The strict checking of valid trigger flags this introduces does result in
> FW_BUG messages on quite a few devices. E.g. on the Yoga Tablet 2 1051L:
>  byt_gpio INT33FC:00: [Firmware Bug]: pin 92: direct_irq_en set but no IRQ assigned, clearing
>  byt_gpio INT33FC:00: [Firmware Bug]: pin 93: direct_irq_en set but no IRQ assigned, clearing
>   These 2 also have mux set to 7 and fall + rise + level trigger bits set,
>   presumably something has written 0xffffffff to their conf0 registers
>  byt_gpio INT33FC:02: Pin 3: uses direct IRQ 1 (IO-APIC 68)
>  byt_gpio INT33FC:02: [Firmware Bug]: pin 3: direct_irq_en set without trigger (conf0: 2803cc00h), clearing
>   Most tablets seem to have this, looking at DSDTs this seems intended for
>   use with an I2C HID sensor-hub and is still set on devices without one.
> 
> To make sure this does not cause any regressions this has been tested,
> including checking disabled direct-IRQs are not used in the DSDT,
> on the following devices:
> 
> Asus ME176C
> Asus TF103C
> Chuwi Vi10 (with its Windows BIOS)
> HP x2 10-n000nd
> Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 1050L (Android version, without EC, with buggy DSDT)
> Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 1051L (Windows version, with EC)
> 
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-12 21:02 [PATCH v4] pinctrl: baytrail: Clear direct_irq_en flag on broken configs Hans de Goede
2022-01-13  8:29 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2022-01-24 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yd/i54iSdRGv1peX@lahna \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.