From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-progs: check: properly skip preallocated/nodatasum extents when re-calculating csum tree
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:22:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdMit5hpCtAxlJHW@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211224055019.51555-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 01:50:14PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Merry Christmas and happy new year!
>
> [BUG]
> Issue #420 mentions that --init-csum-tree creates extra csum for
> preallocated extents.
>
> Causing extra errors after --init-csum-tree.
>
> [CAUSE]
> Csum re-calculation code doesn't take the following factors into
> consideration:
>
> - NODATASUM inodes
> - Preallocated extents
> No csum should be calculated for those data extents
>
> - Partically written preallocated csum
> Csum should only be created for the referred part
>
> So currently csum recalculation will just create csum for any data
> extents it found, causing the mentioned errors.
>
> [FIX]
>
> - Bug fix for backref iteration
> Firstly fix a bug in backref code where indirect ref is not properly
> resolved.
>
> This allows us to use iterate_extent_inodes() to make our lives much
> easier checking the file extents.
>
> - Code move for --init-csum-tree
> Move it to mode independent mode-common.[ch]
>
> - Fix for --init-csum-tree
> Using iterate_extent_inodes() to do that.
>
> - Fix for --init-csum-tree --init-extent-tree
> The same fix, just into a different context
>
> - New test case
>
Eesh that's not great. Thanks for fixing this up,
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Thanks,
Josef
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-24 5:50 [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-progs: check: properly skip preallocated/nodatasum extents when re-calculating csum tree Qu Wenruo
2021-12-24 5:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: backref: properly queue indirect refs Qu Wenruo
2021-12-24 5:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs-progs: check: move csum tree population into mode-common.[ch] Qu Wenruo
2021-12-24 5:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs-progs: check: don't calculate csum for preallocated file extents Qu Wenruo
2021-12-24 5:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs-progs: check: skip NODATASUM inodes for `--init-csum-tree --init-extent-tree` Qu Wenruo
2021-12-24 5:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: add test case for init-csum-tree Qu Wenruo
2022-01-03 16:22 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdMit5hpCtAxlJHW@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.