All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	josef@toxicpanda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs/254: test cleaning up of the stale device
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 00:03:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdRvu1guqLdmm4/5@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <765bf2fb-8af0-9459-b759-7a8d39d872c5@oracle.com>

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 07:25:20PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> 
> Gentle ping? More below.

It's already been merged in last update.

> 
> On 20/12/2021 19:06, Anand Jain wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 19/12/2021 22:02, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 02:14:41AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> > > > Recreating a new filesystem or adding a device to a mounted the
> > > > filesystem
> > > > should remove the device entries under its previous fsid even when
> > > > confused with different device paths to the same device.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixed by the kernel patch (in the ml):
> > > >    btrfs: harden identification of the stale device
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> > > 
> > > I was testing with v5.16-rc2 kernel, which should not contain the kernel
> > > fix, but test still passed for me, I was testing with three loop devices
> > > as SCRATCH_DEV_POOL, and all default mkfs & mount options
> > > 
> > > SECTION       -- btrfs
> > > RECREATING    -- btrfs on /dev/mapper/testvg-lv1
> > > FSTYP         -- btrfs
> > > PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 fedoravm 5.16.0-rc2 #22 SMP PREEMPT
> > > Mon Nov 29 00:54:26 CST 2021
> > > MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/loop0
> > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop0 /mnt/scratch
> > > btrfs/254 5s ...  5s
> > > Ran: btrfs/254
> > > Passed all 1 tests
> > > 
> > > Anything wrong with my setup?
> > > 
> > > And if tested with lv devices as SCRATCH_DEV_POOL
> > > 
> > > SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/mapper/testvg-lv2 /dev/mapper/testvg-lv3
> > > /dev/mapper/testvg-lv4 /dev/mapper/testvg-lv5
> > > /dev/mapper/testvg-lv6"
> > > 
> > > I got the following test failure
> > > 
> > >   QA output created by 254
> > > +ERROR: cannot unregister device '/dev/mapper/254-test': No such
> > > file or directory
> > >   Label: none  uuid: <UUID>
> > >          Total devices <NUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
> > >          devid <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should use _require_scratch_nolvm as well?
> > > 
> > 
> 
> > The test case is inconsistent because the systemd-udev block device scan
> > interferes with the test script. There is no way to disable the
> > systemd-udev scan (that I could find).
> > 
> > The same inconsistency (due to race with systemd-udev scan) would
> > persist with/without lvm.
> > 
> > So when the race fails, the test case is successful to reproduce the
> > issue. As you saw in the 2nd iteration.
> 
> 
> There isn't any approach to stop the test case from racing with the device
> scan, so reproducing the issue is inconsistent. As we have had some success
> so IMO this test case can still integrate, it will help to verify the kernel

Agreed.

> fix on some systems.
> 
> More below.
> 
> > 
> > Any suggestions?
> > 
> > Thanks, Anand
> > 
> > 
> > > > ---
> > > > v2: Add kernel patch title in the test case
> > > >      Redirect device add output to /dev/null (avoids tirm message)
> > > >      Use the lv path for mkfs and the dm path for the device add
> > > >       so that now path used in udev scan should match with what
> > > >       we already have in the kernel memory.
> > > > 
> > > > -       _mkfs_dev $uuid -draid1 -mraid1 $dmdev $scratch_dev2
> > > > +       _mkfs_dev $uuid -draid1 -mraid1 $lvdev $scratch_dev2
> > > >          # Add device should free the device under $uuid in the kernel.
> > > > -       $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add -f $lvdev $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > +       $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add -f $dmdev $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   tests/btrfs/254     | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   tests/btrfs/254.out |   6 +++
> > > >   2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
> > > >   create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/254
> > > >   create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/254.out
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/254 b/tests/btrfs/254
> > > > new file mode 100755
> > > > index 000000000000..b70b9d165897
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/254
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> > > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Anand Jain. All Rights Reserved.
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
> > > > +#
> > > > +# FS QA Test No. 254
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Test if the kernel can free the stale device entries.
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Tests bug fixed by the kernel patch:
> > > > +#    btrfs: harden identification of the stale device
> > > > +#
> > > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > > +_begin_fstest auto quick
> > > > +
> > > > +# Override the default cleanup function.
> > > > +node=$seq-test
> > > > +cleanup_dmdev()
> > > > +{
> > > > +    _dmsetup_remove $node
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +_cleanup()
> > > > +{
> > > > +    cd /
> > > > +    rm -f $tmp.*
> > > > +    rm -rf $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > +    cleanup_dmdev
> > > 
> > > Should wipefs in cleanup as well, otherwise test fails with non-unique
> > > UUID
> > > 
> > > -Label: none  uuid: <UUID>
> > > -       Total devices <NUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
> > > -       devid <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
> > > -       *** Some devices missing
> 
> > > +ERROR: non-unique UUID: 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
> 
> 
>  We don't need non-unique UUID. I have fixed this in v3.

Then would you please help patch the existing test? And we should add
'volume' group as well?

Thanks,
Eryu

> 
> Thanks,
> Anand
> 
> 
> > > +btrfs-progs v5.4
> > > +See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eryu
> > > 
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +# Import common functions.
> > > > +. ./common/filter
> > > > +. ./common/filter.btrfs
> > > > +
> > > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > > +_supported_fs btrfs
> > > > +_require_scratch_dev_pool 3
> > > > +_require_block_device $SCRATCH_DEV
> > > > +_require_dm_target linear
> > > > +_require_btrfs_forget_or_module_loadable
> > > > +_require_scratch_nocheck
> > > > +_require_command "$WIPEFS_PROG" wipefs
> > > > +
> > > > +_scratch_dev_pool_get 3
> > > > +
> > > > +setup_dmdev()
> > > > +{
> > > > +    # Some small size.
> > > > +    size=$((1024 * 1024 * 1024))
> > > > +    size_in_sector=$((size / 512))
> > > > +
> > > > +    table="0 $size_in_sector linear $SCRATCH_DEV 0"
> > > > +    _dmsetup_create $node --table "$table" || \
> > > > +        _fail "setup dm device failed"
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +# Use a known it is much easier to debug.
> > > > +uuid="--uuid 12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc"
> > > > +lvdev=/dev/mapper/$node
> > > > +
> > > > +seq_mnt=$TEST_DIR/$seq.mnt
> > > > +mkdir -p $seq_mnt
> > > > +
> > > > +test_forget()
> > > > +{
> > > > +    setup_dmdev
> > > > +    dmdev=$(realpath $lvdev)
> > > > +
> > > > +    _mkfs_dev $uuid $dmdev
> > > > +
> > > > +    # Check if we can un-scan using the mapper device path.
> > > > +    $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan --forget $lvdev
> > > > +
> > > > +    # Cleanup
> > > > +    $WIPEFS_PROG -a $lvdev > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > +    $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan --forget
> > > > +
> > > > +    cleanup_dmdev
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +test_add_device()
> > > > +{
> > > > +    setup_dmdev
> > > > +    dmdev=$(realpath $lvdev)
> > > > +    scratch_dev2=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $2}')
> > > > +    scratch_dev3=$(echo $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL | awk '{print $3}')
> > > > +
> > > > +    _mkfs_dev $scratch_dev3
> > > > +    _mount $scratch_dev3 $seq_mnt
> > > > +
> > > > +    _mkfs_dev $uuid -draid1 -mraid1 $lvdev $scratch_dev2
> > > > +
> > > > +    # Add device should free the device under $uuid in the kernel.
> > > > +    $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add -f $dmdev $seq_mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
> > > > +
> > > > +    _mount -o degraded $scratch_dev2 $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > > +
> > > > +    # Check if the missing device is shown.
> > > > +    $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem show -m $SCRATCH_MNT | \
> > > > +                    _filter_btrfs_filesystem_show
> > > > +
> > > > +    $UMOUNT_PROG $seq_mnt
> > > > +    _scratch_unmount
> > > > +    cleanup_dmdev
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +test_forget
> > > > +test_add_device
> > > > +
> > > > +_scratch_dev_pool_put
> > > > +
> > > > +status=0
> > > > +exit
> > > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/254.out b/tests/btrfs/254.out
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..20819cf5140c
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/btrfs/254.out
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > > > +QA output created by 254
> > > > +Label: none  uuid: <UUID>
> > > > +    Total devices <NUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
> > > > +    devid <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
> > > > +    *** Some devices missing
> > > > +
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.27.0

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10 18:14 [PATCH v2] btrfs/254: test cleaning up of the stale device Anand Jain
2021-12-19 14:02 ` Eryu Guan
2021-12-20 11:06   ` Anand Jain
2022-01-04 11:25     ` Anand Jain
2022-01-04 16:03       ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2022-01-05  4:19         ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdRvu1guqLdmm4/5@desktop \
    --to=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.