From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Use level_promoted and pae_root shadow page for 32bit guests
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 20:55:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdS0J1mmpYmD4KcL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210092508.7185-7-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> index 476b133544dd..822ff5d76b91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> @@ -100,13 +100,8 @@ static inline bool is_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
> if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(hpa)))
> return false;
>
> - /*
> - * A NULL shadow page is legal when shadowing a non-paging guest with
> - * PAE paging, as the MMU will be direct with root_hpa pointing at the
> - * pae_root page, not a shadow page.
> - */
> sp = to_shadow_page(hpa);
> - return sp && is_tdp_mmu_page(sp) && sp->root_count;
> + return is_tdp_mmu_page(sp) && sp->root_count;
> }
is_page_fault_stale() can get similar treatment
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index e8c69c2dfbd9..9ff8e228b55e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3855,19 +3855,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = to_shadow_page(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa);
- /* Special roots, e.g. pae_root, are not backed by shadow pages. */
- if (sp && is_obsolete_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp))
- return true;
-
- /*
- * Roots without an associated shadow page are considered invalid if
- * there is a pending request to free obsolete roots. The request is
- * only a hint that the current root _may_ be obsolete and needs to be
- * reloaded, e.g. if the guest frees a PGD that KVM is tracking as a
- * previous root, then __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page() signals all vCPUs
- * to reload even if no vCPU is actively using the root.
- */
- if (!sp && kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu))
+ if (is_obsolete_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp))
return true;
return fault->slot &&
> #else
> static inline bool kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm) { return false; }
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 9:25 [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: X86: Add and use shadow page with level promoted or acting as pae_root Lai Jiangshan
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] KVM: X86: Check root_level only in fast_pgd_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: Walk shadow page starting with shadow_root_level Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-04 20:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-04 20:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Add arguement gfn and role to kvm_mmu_alloc_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] KVM: X86: Introduce role.level_promoted Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 22:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-11 16:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] KVM: X86: Alloc pae_root shadow page Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 21:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 3:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-05 16:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 2:01 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-06 19:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-07 4:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-12-10 9:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Use level_promoted and pae_root shadow page for 32bit guests Lai Jiangshan
2022-01-04 20:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-12-10 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: X86: Add and use shadow page with level promoted or acting as pae_root Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdS0J1mmpYmD4KcL@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.