From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18738C433FE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0207518D0; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:34:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 0207518D0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1641386093; bh=ehS9Wp4klxNh6imSS80ubyOMxmVlzZk1ZeiNIm5nyzI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=mG4yFRay54k04uTHGo4UPLXo5QiOVJonyn7uUCQwHZHFHlQEp0TI3IYlZN9pGxOi3 bV0f8uTaETUbUIGYTiwfeMO6s8tiwBsCmyEMBjTDBFT1JKfw9PkJHVj68MKhKvhZ/5 N8O2t1ufUxwBomE2nU9trfWcAO0e8hSvJVV0l07M= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B55F80167; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:34:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id A4146F80089; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:34:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A12F80089 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:33:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz D6A12F80089 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="nEVBmKp/" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D78EB81A88; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EFCDC36AEB; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1641386031; bh=ehS9Wp4klxNh6imSS80ubyOMxmVlzZk1ZeiNIm5nyzI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nEVBmKp/xF2RVPedxZZvilxaYXiDqhT3DrhbW83UTQyahfZyJsZaN+lJM51WfrAk6 j0PiHLXuJiAeyXdA0apXnG2LkU2s5cr6u4uKuWlrKCrtpULjI4k2xM57MPV+8dXxeq Zd20bPOyU6nd/wdgEhje87Elak00dlFhn8wA6kQ0= Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:33:48 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Baole Fang Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Legion Y9000X 2020 Message-ID: References: <20220105034103.12484-1-fbl718@163.com> <757a4402-1067-e3c8-8ca3-43ee62047ebe@163.com> <6bf35d26-73d4-ba14-f931-8d379c623482@163.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6bf35d26-73d4-ba14-f931-8d379c623482@163.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kailang Yang , Jeremy Szu , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Elia Devito , Takashi Iwai , Werner Sembach , Hui Wang , Sami Loone , Cameron Berkenpas X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +0800, Baole Fang wrote: > Thank you for your explanation! I shouldn't have written that line and I > supposed it can be ignored. Is there anything else I could do? We can not just "ignore" it, you need to fix your change up and resend it in a proper format so that it can be applied. As-is, it is not acceptable, sorry. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF35C433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240044AbiAEMdx (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 07:33:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43574 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231857AbiAEMdw (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 07:33:52 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CB7C061761 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:33:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A31EB6170E for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EFCDC36AEB; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1641386031; bh=ehS9Wp4klxNh6imSS80ubyOMxmVlzZk1ZeiNIm5nyzI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nEVBmKp/xF2RVPedxZZvilxaYXiDqhT3DrhbW83UTQyahfZyJsZaN+lJM51WfrAk6 j0PiHLXuJiAeyXdA0apXnG2LkU2s5cr6u4uKuWlrKCrtpULjI4k2xM57MPV+8dXxeq Zd20bPOyU6nd/wdgEhje87Elak00dlFhn8wA6kQ0= Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:33:48 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Baole Fang Cc: Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Jeremy Szu , Werner Sembach , Hui Wang , Cameron Berkenpas , Kailang Yang , Sami Loone , Elia Devito , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Legion Y9000X 2020 Message-ID: References: <20220105034103.12484-1-fbl718@163.com> <757a4402-1067-e3c8-8ca3-43ee62047ebe@163.com> <6bf35d26-73d4-ba14-f931-8d379c623482@163.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6bf35d26-73d4-ba14-f931-8d379c623482@163.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:29:26PM +0800, Baole Fang wrote: > Thank you for your explanation! I shouldn't have written that line and I > supposed it can be ignored. Is there anything else I could do? We can not just "ignore" it, you need to fix your change up and resend it in a proper format so that it can be applied. As-is, it is not acceptable, sorry. thanks, greg k-h