Re: [RFD]: Solving qcom unique unit address warnings

[Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>]

On 21-01-22, 22:38, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Hi Rob,

Any guidance on how to resolve this...?

> 
> On all Qualcomm SoCs there exists QUP serial engine. These engines are
> loaded with a firmware by bootloader and can support a specific protocol
> like I2C/SPI/uart etc.
> 
> Since the serial engine can support different protocols we end up
> describing all the supported ones for this, as illustrated below from
> sdm845 dts upstream:
> 
> 		qupv3_id_0: geniqup@8c0000 {
> 			compatible = "qcom,geni-se-qup";
> 			reg = <0 0x008c0000 0 0x6000>;
> 			clock-names = "m-ahb", "s-ahb";
> 			clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_0_M_AHB_CLK>,
> 				 <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP_0_S_AHB_CLK>;
> 			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x3 0x0>;
> 			#address-cells = <2>;
> 			#size-cells = <2>;
> 			ranges;
> 			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_1 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>;
> 			interconnect-names = "qup-core";
> 			status = "disabled";
> 
> 			i2c0: i2c@880000 {
> 				compatible = "qcom,geni-i2c";
> 				reg = <0 0x00880000 0 0x4000>;
> 				clock-names = "se";
> 				clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP0_S0_CLK>;
> 				pinctrl-names = "default";
> 				pinctrl-0 = <&qup_i2c0_default>;
> 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 601 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> 				#address-cells = <1>;
> 				#size-cells = <0>;
> 				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SDM845_CX>;
> 				operating-points-v2 = <&qup_opp_table>;
> 				interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_1 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>,
> 						<&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>,
> 						<&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_1 0 &mem_noc SLAVE_EBI1 0>;
> 				interconnect-names = "qup-core", "qup-config", "qup-memory";
> 				status = "disabled";
> 			};
> 
> 			spi0: spi@880000 {
> 				compatible = "qcom,geni-spi";
> 				reg = <0 0x00880000 0 0x4000>;
> 				clock-names = "se";
> 				clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP0_S0_CLK>;
> 				pinctrl-names = "default";
> 				pinctrl-0 = <&qup_spi0_default>;
> 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 601 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> 				#address-cells = <1>;
> 				#size-cells = <0>;
> 				interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_1 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>,
> 						<&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>;
> 				interconnect-names = "qup-core", "qup-config";
> 				status = "disabled";
> 			};
> 
> 			uart0: serial@880000 {
> 				compatible = "qcom,geni-uart";
> 				reg = <0 0x00880000 0 0x4000>;
> 				clock-names = "se";
> 				clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP0_S0_CLK>;
> 				pinctrl-names = "default";
> 				pinctrl-0 = <&qup_uart0_default>;
> 				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 601 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> 				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SDM845_CX>;
> 				operating-points-v2 = <&qup_opp_table>;
> 				interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_QUP_1 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>,
> 						<&gladiator_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_BLSP_1 0>;
> 				interconnect-names = "qup-core", "qup-config";
> 				status = "disabled";
> 			};
> 
> 
> The problem comes with all these nodes having same unit addresses. This
> is adding to ~2K warning for unique_unit_address upstream.
> 
> So to solve this we thought of creating a qup se node and then query the
> protocol supported from the firmware on boot and create a child
> auxillary_device. The problem with that approach is another warning
> "node name for SPI buses should be 'spi'"! So that would not help
> 
> Now, I cant think of any better idea here, except maybe move these to
> respective board dts and perhaps keep them commented here for
> documentation.
> 
> Do we have any better idea to solve this problem?
> 
> Thanks
> -- 
> ~Vinod

-- 
~Vinod