All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] qmp: Support for querying stats
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 12:08:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfkiyiK+jfrdbVcY@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131194312.1192626-2-mark.kanda@oracle.com>

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 01:43:10PM -0600, Mark Kanda wrote:
> Introduce QMP support for querying stats. Provide a framework for adding new
> stats and support for the following commands:
> 
> - query-stats
> Returns a list of all stats per target type (only VM and VCPU for now), with
> additional options for specifying stat names, VCPU qom paths, and stat provider.
> 
> - query-stats-schemas
> Returns a list of stats included in each schema type, with an option for
> specifying the stat provider.
> 
> The framework provides a method to register callbacks for these QMP commands.
> 
> The first usecase will be for fd-based KVM stats (in an upcoming patch).
> 
> Examples (with fd-based KVM stats):
> 
> - Display all VM stats:
> 
> { "execute": "query-stats", "arguments" : { "target": "vm" } }
> { "return": {
>     "list": [
>       { "provider": "kvm",
>         "stats": [
>           { "name": "max_mmu_page_hash_collisions", "value": 0 },
>           { "name": "max_mmu_rmap_size", "value": 0 },
>           { "name": "nx_lpage_splits", "value": 131 },
>          ...
>         ] }
>       { "provider": "provider XYZ",
>       ...
>     ],
>     "target": "vm"
>   }
> }

I still feel like this is rather verbose, and should be simplified
down to.

 { "return": {
     "vm": {
       "kvm": [ ... ]
       "provider-XYZ": [ ... ],
       ...
     }
 }


While vCPU would need one extra nesting layer

 { "return": {
     "vcpus": [
       {
         "path": "/vcpu0/path"
         "kvm": [ ... ]
         "provider-XYZ": [ ... ],
         ...
       },
       {
         "path": "/vcpu1/path"
         "kvm": [ ... ]
         "provider-XYZ": [ ... ],
         ...
       },
       ...
     ],
 }


The notable difference here is that we'd be adding new
keys to the StatsResultEntry struct, every time we gain
a new provider, so your QMP code couldn't be entirely
metadata driven - you'd need new code to wire up each
stats provider. 


> - Display 'exits' and 'l1d_flush' KVM stats for VCPUs at '/machine/unattached/device[2]'
> and '/machine/unattached/device[4]':

Shows the value of giving CPUs proper paths

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg06744.html

> 
> { "execute": "query-stats",
>   "arguments" : { "target": "vcpu",
>                   "fields": [ "exits", "l1d_flush" ],
> 	          "paths": [ "/machine/unattached/device[2]",
> 	                      "/machine/unattached/device[4]" ]
>                   "provider": "kvm" } }

This design requires multiple query-stats calls to get data from
multiple providers which I think is very undesirable from a
performance POV.

I'd like to see us able to query fields from many providers at
once

ie so we have something that looks like
 
 { "execute": "query-stats",
   "arguments" : { "target": "vcpu",
 	           "vcpus": [ "/machine/unattached/device[2]",
 	                      "/machine/unattached/device[4]" ]
                   "kvm": [ "exits", "l1d_flush" ],
		   "someprovider: [ "somefield" ] } }


> 
> { "return": {
>     "list": [
>       { "list": [
>           { "provider": "kvm",
>             "stats": [
>               { "name": "l1d_flush", "value": 14690 },
>               { "name": "exits", "value": 50898 }
>             ] }
>         ],
>         "path": "/machine/unattached/device[2]"
>       },
>       { "list": [
>           { "provider": "kvm",
>             "stats": [
>               { "name": "l1d_flush", "value": 24902 },
>               { "name": "exits", "value": 74374 }
>             ] }
> 	 ],
>         "path": "/machine/unattached/device[4]"
>       }
>     ],
>     "target": "vcpu"
>   }
> }
> 
> - Query stats schemas:
> 
> { "execute": "query-stats-schemas" }
> { "return": {
>     "vcpu": [
>       { "provider": "kvm",
>         "stats": [
>            { "name": "guest_mode",
>              "unit": "none",
>              "base": 10,
>              "exponent": 0,
>              "type": "instant" },
> 	   { "name": "directed_yield_successful",
>              "unit": "none",
>              "base": 10,
>              "exponent": 0,
>              "type": "cumulative" },
>              ...
> 	"provider": "provider XYZ",
> ...
>    "vm": [
>       { "provider": "kvm",
>         "stats": [
>            { "name": "max_mmu_page_hash_collisions",
>              "unit": "none",
>              "base": 10,
>              "exponent": 0,
>              "type": "peak" },
> 	"provider": "provider XYZ",
> ...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/monitor/stats.h |  36 ++++++
>  monitor/qmp-cmds.c      | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  qapi/misc.json          | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 472 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/monitor/stats.h
> 

> diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json
> index e8054f415b..8d326464f0 100644
> --- a/qapi/misc.json
> +++ b/qapi/misc.json

I'd suggest we introduce a 'stats.json' file just for this. We have
quite a few data types introduced, and its good to avoid 'misc.json'
becoming a dumping ground for ranom unrelated stuff.

> @@ -527,3 +527,256 @@
>   'data': { '*option': 'str' },
>   'returns': ['CommandLineOptionInfo'],
>   'allow-preconfig': true }
> +
> +##
> +# @StatType:

There's inconsistency with naming through these changes. Can we
ensure that everything uses 'Stats' (plural) as the prefix for
every type.

> +#
> +# Enumeration of stat types
> +# @cumulative: stat is cumulative; value can only increase.
> +# @instant: stat is instantaneous; value can increase or decrease.
> +# @peak: stat is the peak value; value can only increase.

Not documenting all members

> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'enum' : 'StatType',
> +  'data' : [ 'cumulative', 'instant', 'peak',
> +             'linear-hist', 'log-hist', 'unknown' ] }

IMHO 'unknown' shouldn't exist at all.

> +##
> +# @StatsVCPURequest:
> +#
> +# vcpu specific filter element.
> +# @paths: list of qom paths.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'StatsVCPURequest',
> +  'base': 'StatsRequest',
> +  'data': { '*paths': [ 'str' ] } }

Call the field 'vcpus' instead of 'paths' to make it
clear that we're listing VCPU paths here.

> +##
> +# @StatsRequest:
> +#
> +# Stats filter element.
> +# @provider: stat provider.
> +# @fields: list of stat names.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'StatsRequest',
> +  'data': { '*provider': 'StatsProvider',
> +            '*fields': [ 'str' ] } }

As mentioned earlier I think we need to have aility to query from
many providers at once. It'd be better to have provider name as
the field name, eg

 { 'struct': 'StatsRequest',
   'data': { '*kvm': ['str'],
             '*someprovider': [ 'str' ] } }

> +
> +##
> +# @StatsFilter:
> +#
> +# Target specific filter.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'union': 'StatsFilter',
> +  'base': { 'target': 'StatsTarget' },
> +  'discriminator': 'target',
> +  'data': { 'vcpu': 'StatsVCPURequest',
> +            'vm': 'StatsRequest' } }

> +##
> +# @StatsValueArray:
> +#
> +# uint64 list for StatsValue.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'StatsValueArray',
> +  'data': { 'list' : [ 'uint64' ] } }

'values' or 'elements' rather than repeating 'list'

> +
> +##
> +# @StatsValue:
> +#
> +# @scalar: stat is single uint64.
> +# @list: stat is a list of uint64.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'alternate': 'StatsValue',
> +  'data': { 'scalar': 'uint64',
> +            'list': 'StatsValueArray' } }
> +
> +##
> +# @Stats:
> +#
> +# @name: name of stat.
> +# @value: stat value.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'Stats',
> +  'data': { 'name': 'str',
> +            'value' : 'StatsValue' } }
> +
> +##
> +# @StatsResultsEntry:
> +#
> +# @provider: stat provider.
> +# @stats: list of stats.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'StatsResultsEntry',
> +  'data': { 'provider': 'StatsProvider',
> +            'stats': [ 'Stats' ] } }
> +
> +##
> +# @VCPUResultsEntry:
> +#
> +# @path: qom path.
> +# @list: per provider @StatsResultEntry list.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'VCPUResultsEntry',
> +  'data': { 'path': 'str',
> +            'list': [ 'StatsResultsEntry' ] } }
> +
> +##
> +# @VMStatsResults:
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'VMStatsResults',
> +  'data': { 'list' : [ 'StatsResultsEntry' ] } }
> +
> +##
> +# @VCPUStatsResults:
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'VCPUStatsResults',
> +  'data': { 'list': [ 'VCPUResultsEntry' ] } }
> +
> +##
> +# @StatsResults:
> +#
> +# Target specific results.
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'union': 'StatsResults',
> +  'base': { 'target': 'StatsTarget' },
> +  'discriminator': 'target',
> +  'data': { 'vcpu': 'VCPUStatsResults',
> +            'vm': 'VMStatsResults' } }

I feel we can simplify this all down somewhat, eliminating levels
of redundant nesting

{ 'struct': 'StatsResultsEntry',
  'data': { '*kvm': [ 'Stats' ] } }

{ 'struct': 'StatsResultsVCPUEntry',
  'base': 'StatsResultsEntry',
  'data': 'path': 'str' } }

{ 'struct': 'StatsResults',
  'data': {
      '*vcpus': ['StatsResultsVCPUEntry'],
      '*vm': 'StatsResultsEntry'
  }
}


> +
> +##
> +# @query-stats:
> +#
> +# data: @StatsFilter
> +# Returns: @StatsResults
> +#
> +# Since: 7.0
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'query-stats',
> +  'data': 'StatsFilter',
> +  'boxed': true,
> +  'returns': 'StatsResults' }

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-01 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-31 19:43 [PATCH v3 0/3] Support fd-based KVM stats Mark Kanda
2022-01-31 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] qmp: Support for querying stats Mark Kanda
2022-02-01 10:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-01 11:01     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-11 13:51       ` Markus Armbruster
2022-02-01 12:08   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-02-03 18:12     ` Mark Kanda
2022-02-03 18:30       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-03 18:37         ` Mark Kanda
2022-02-03 18:39       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-03 18:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-03 18:53       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-03 18:52     ` Mark Kanda
2022-01-31 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hmp: " Mark Kanda
2022-01-31 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] kvm: Support for querying fd-based stats Mark Kanda
2022-02-01 10:08   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:51   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfkiyiK+jfrdbVcY@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.kanda@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.