All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: re-init state for retransmitted syn-ack
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 05:42:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfyutjS49exLZwma@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8388b8bd-3c41-a8ec-c338-28be9491fa74@netfilter.org>

On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 09:25:05PM +0100, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> 
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, Florian Westphal wrote:
> 
> > TCP conntrack assumes that a syn-ack retransmit is identical to the
> > previous syn-ack.  This isn't correct and causes stuck 3whs in some more
> > esoteric scenarios.  tcpdump to illustrate the problem:
> > 
> >  client > server: Flags [S] seq 1365731894, win 29200, [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2083035583 ecr 0,wscale 7]
> >  server > client: Flags [S.] seq 145824453, ack 643160523, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215367629 ecr 2082921663]
> > 
> > Note the invalid/outdated synack ack number.
> > Conntrack marks this syn-ack as out-of-window/invalid, but it did
> > initialize the reply direction parameters based on this packets content.
> > 
> >  client > server: Flags [S] seq 1365731894, win 29200, [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2083036623 ecr 0,wscale 7]
> > 
> > ... retransmit...
> > 
> >  server > client: Flags [S.], seq 145824453, ack 643160523, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215368644 ecr 2082921663]
> > 
> > and another bogus synack. This repeats, then client re-uses for a new
> > attempt:
> > 
> > client > server: Flags [S], seq 2375731741, win 29200, [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2083100223 ecr 0,wscale 7]
> > server > client: Flags [S.], seq 145824453, ack 643160523, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215430754 ecr 2082921663]
> > 
> > ... but still gets a invalid syn-ack.
> > 
> > This repeats until:
> > 
> >  server > client: Flags [S.], seq 145824453, ack 643160523, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215437785 ecr 2082921663]
> >  server > client: Flags [R.], seq 145824454, ack 643160523, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215443451 ecr 2082921663]
> >  client > server: Flags [S], seq 2375731741, win 29200, [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2083115583 ecr 0,wscale 7]
> >  server > client: Flags [S.], seq 162602410, ack 2375731742, win 65535, [mss 8952,wscale 5,TS val 3215445754 ecr 2083115583]
> > 
> > This syn-ack has the correct ack number, but conntrack flags it as
> > invalid: The internal state was created from the first syn-ack seen
> > so the sequence number of the syn-ack is treated as being outside of
> > the announced window.
> 
> I can only assume that the client is/are behind like a carrier-grade NAT
> and the bogus SYN-ACK sent by the server is replying a connection attempt 
> from another client. Yes, the best thing to do is to reinit the state.
> 
> > Don't assume that retransmitted syn-ack is identical to previous one.
> > Treat it like the first syn-ack and reinit state.
> > 
> > Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> 
> Acked-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>

Applied, thanks

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-29 16:47 [PATCH nf 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: move synack init code to helper Florian Westphal
2022-01-29 16:47 ` [PATCH nf 2/2] netfilter: conntrack: re-init state for retransmitted syn-ack Florian Westphal
2022-01-29 20:25   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2022-01-29 20:28     ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-04  4:42     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-01-29 20:18 ` [PATCH nf 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: move synack init code to helper Jozsef Kadlecsik
2022-02-04  4:42   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfyutjS49exLZwma@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.