From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25B6C433FE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243990AbiBJQF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:05:27 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:59504 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238433AbiBJQF0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:05:26 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C958C26; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id q7so10345882wrc.13; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:05:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pOy4s7AtfAiIbY/f4X/cj2Mnq2IZEHHcQFmlpYsQx9Q=; b=hnqb+NNN9oC9NBK1z2IvfIZWtDN7NUQpGubZo0a/7/L+qM7G1IRP6RCoWvpMUDYpfc uoMMHOpVkOUUMvqgNL9jm2fCQPmmpRaTGMk5NEu22uDGNQhtD0zlN0Fy6qQC309Sx+yu aJDQ49gpKxzU0+ZPidk8IPOIpNoCZ2H6JR03dayIyGS6K4+UowLq3jVKemidc5ASZs7H mLOZ+BLu4pbMpL14EDCqtwVOGa7wjtg8qCwk19rk6r1fRhtQjqe7RqBRE5+2wpJnFNPT BqmKfaH/JpVqRrvRhRvropNsA4CTRnO7S82VW9ClegT5982G7g+e7f0n8K+8ZiwDm2nW Thnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pOy4s7AtfAiIbY/f4X/cj2Mnq2IZEHHcQFmlpYsQx9Q=; b=jjRccXAYCttAJ5xVew2iBtbGwojwKZ20v2aIjdwXStCHF9bkQfxLAaUzVi5gpvwINW mBhRWa+n3DXsY1Bq0VrYTj+RsDS3VhclkDb3vqWdtePsyRS3Pc5Jmo7BF5QX/lu0d/Pv dR2RwZ1ARio6zYHOLiMsGjN1N8d9hRs4I7BmPyQBcZ0M6fH+dCqiFdOEDG7Z6NBQ/zz4 /p9E7nHorHIfl6Pb6eLyfqh6UXmPC82GiPbcNuwjdsXs7TaOUvReld3cQDDqqPIq9pYu M8ze1YFMzV4Tw+t/MrYWRvudWcuO49NsmKwiNo+qNh0H/X/GaMH5y5xUmCPlzk4PtlQB oH3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302LthNNKlK/8pPxTdKHq1w5e3nAjxGkqBXHDp+xKyHgCDWFaCS CoBnF0zpEtipVqPkkiFpbs4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdJC/tgv0rTZN0QM1pg/FQTSHuCjoVma9nD1D1VrlRUiS2NfuZVOwpuR7/qf3PLXSFNKETfA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:18ae:: with SMTP id b14mr6913931wri.100.1644509126162; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm18641925wrs.85.2022.02.10.08.05.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:05:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:05:23 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/2] 4.19.229-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220209191248.596319706@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209191248.596319706@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release. > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/736 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip